From: "REH" <me@you.com>
Subject: Re: protected type interrupts
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:16:18 GMT
Date: 2006-08-26T13:16:18+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CQXHg.29196$8j3.20839@twister.nyroc.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 00SHg.153600$1i1.101654@attbi_s72
"Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.not.jrcarter@acm.not.spam.org> wrote in message
news:00SHg.153600$1i1.101654@attbi_s72...
> No. It may be executed by the same thread of control that executed the
> interrupt handler,
This is what I was trying to say.
>but that is not the same thing as executing it from the protected procedure
>that is the interrupt handler.
I didn't mean to say this.
Thanks,
REH
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-26 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-24 14:47 protected type interrupts REH
2006-08-24 15:39 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-24 16:23 ` REH
2006-08-24 18:15 ` Adam Beneschan
2006-08-24 19:16 ` REH
2006-08-24 21:16 ` Adam Beneschan
2006-08-24 21:39 ` REH
2006-08-25 6:45 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-24 23:55 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-25 6:42 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-24 23:47 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-25 6:38 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-24 20:11 ` Simon Wright
2006-08-24 23:50 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-25 6:48 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-25 11:33 ` REH
2006-08-25 17:27 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-25 20:57 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-25 23:17 ` REH
2006-08-26 6:38 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-26 13:16 ` REH [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox