From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.not.jrcarter@acm.not.spam.org>
Subject: Re: Ripple effect
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:39:14 GMT
Date: 2006-08-24T23:39:14+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CMqHg.151544$1i1.36729@attbi_s72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ecjr2r$8vd$1@sunnews.cern.ch>
Maciej Sobczak wrote:
>
> Why?
> If you remove some use clause that might affect the visibility of some
> primitive operation, then it will also remove the whole type that is
> involved in a given expression, rendering the whole as illegal.
>
> Could you provide a short example of this Ripple effect?
No. I'm simply aware that STT cites direct operator visibility as
potentially giving rise to the Ripple effect in the Ada FAQ
http://www.adapower.com/index.php?Command=Class&ClassID=FAQ&CID=358
--
Jeff Carter
"Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
07
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-24 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-23 22:29 Ripple effect Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-24 9:21 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-08-24 23:39 ` Jeffrey R. Carter [this message]
2006-08-25 7:03 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-08-24 18:22 ` Adam Beneschan
2006-08-24 23:40 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-09-04 13:52 ` Robert A Duff
2006-09-04 15:15 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-09-04 18:06 ` Robert A Duff
2006-09-05 2:33 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-09-05 7:23 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-09-05 16:28 ` Robert A Duff
2006-09-05 16:23 ` Robert A Duff
2006-09-05 21:36 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-09-07 18:18 ` Robert A Duff
2006-09-08 22:02 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-09-06 0:10 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-09-07 18:30 ` Robert A Duff
2006-09-07 21:21 ` Simon Wright
2006-09-08 2:08 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-09-09 14:55 ` adaworks
2006-09-05 23:52 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-09-07 19:09 ` Adam Beneschan
2006-09-07 19:21 ` Ed Falis
2006-09-07 19:46 ` Larry Kilgallen
2006-09-08 13:06 ` Ed Falis
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox