Re: Accessibility checks

[Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>]

On 18/07/2013 00:44, in article ks7a8v$4nj$1@loke.gir.dk, "Randy Brukardt"
<randy@rrsoftware.com> wrote:

> "Jeffrey Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org> wrote in message
> news:ks718g$aim$2@dont-email.me...

>> Brukardt, ARG member and editor of the ARM, claims that 'Access never
>> works and 'Unchecked_Access is always required, bypassing the
>> accessibility checks. While this is not entirely true, it's quite common
>> that one must use 'Unchecked_Access, so we could do without these rules
>> and checks in the majority of cases.
> 
> That's not entirely true: I did find one (and only one) instance where I was
> able to use 'Access in my code (it had to do with a library-level
> initialization).

Interesting.

My projects have 37 occurrences of 'Access and only 2 of 'Unchecked_Access.

-- 
Bill Findlay
with blueyonder.co.uk;
use  surname & forename;