From: cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!howland.
Subject: Re: Ada Pricing & Quality ?? - Vendors
Date: 15 Sep 93 19:59:06 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CDEvIJ.4ML@inmet.camb.inmet.com> (raw)
Since the base note was fully compliant with my spec, I guess I have
to respond, so here goes:
1. Price
Ada prices are declining across the board. However, you can't compare Unix
workstation prices with PC prices. PC Ada compilers are priced much less
than your $30k, and (I hear) are quite competitively priced to C compilers.
What do you expect to pay for a non-free C or C++ compiler on a workstation?
I'd really like the input.
Also, cross-compilers generally cost more than native compilers because the
development cost has to be amortized over a smaller market.
2. Useful libraries
We are planning interfaces to standard support libraries in our next-generation
products.
3. Documentation of limitations; verification of examples
Yes, quality is important, including document quality. What else can
I say.
4. Are we willing to invest to make Ada succeed?
YES. WATCH THIS SPACE.
-- Mike Ryer
next reply other threads:[~1993-09-15 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1993-09-15 19:59 cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!howland. [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-09-16 4:35 Ada Pricing & Quality ?? - Vendors Robert Kitzberger
1993-09-16 4:47 Gregory Aharonian
1993-09-16 13:55 david.c.willett
1993-09-16 19:05 cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!sp
1993-09-17 0:59 cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!howland.
1993-09-17 20:25 haven.umd.edu!cs.umd.edu!afterlife!admii!ovation!hipmac1.pica.army.mil!us
1993-09-17 20:59 Richard G. Hash
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox