comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: leviticus!karl@uunet.uu.net  (Karl A. Nyberg)
Subject: COTS 2 percent in Ada
Date: 21 Jul 93 01:30:32 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHqv2.ML@grebyn.com> (raw)

In article <SRCTRAN.93Jul20092944@world.std.com> srctran@world.std.com (Gregory
 Aharonian) writes:

>Well most COTS stuff is not done in Ada
>(less than two percent of all COTS stuff has Ada inside), so Perry's
>policy, if successful, will do as much to undermine Ada as the current
>hypocrisy that is tolerated.

Two percent.  Is that by weight or volume (contents may have settled during
shipping :-)) or by amount of CPU cycles consumed on a yearly basis or
dollar volume in the "software market" or what?  What's the margin of error
on the survey (whose source, by the way, you have conveniently failed to
mention)?  What are the percentages for other languages of interest?

That vendors of commercial software would announce the underlying language
used in their implementations is surprising enough to me.  That Ada would
have as much as two percent of the market is even more astounding.

Still, a little backup material on this claim is warranted.

-- Karl --
-- 
Karl Nyberg			-- karl@grebyn.com
Grebyn Corporation		-- 1-703-281-2194
P. O. Box 497			-- Yes, I speak for the company.
Vienna, VA 22183-0497		-- I own it.

             reply	other threads:[~1993-07-21  1:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1993-07-21  1:30 Karl A. Nyberg [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-07-21 13:53 COTS 2 percent in Ada Gregory Aharonian
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox