From: "(see below)" <news@findlayw.plus.com>
Subject: Re: Quantified Expressions: "some"
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:05:14 +0000
Date: 2010-11-17T12:05:14+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C909757A.152E%news@findlayw.plus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1t7pvrh3i022d.8t9yqjonagar$.dlg@40tude.net
On 17/11/2010 10:46, in article 1t7pvrh3i022d.8t9yqjonagar$.dlg@40tude.net,
"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:31:50 -0800 (PST), AdaMagica wrote:
>
>> On 17 Nov., 01:03, Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauh...@maps.futureapps.de>
>> wrote:
>>> � (for all X in domain | P (X))
>>> � (for some X in domain | P (X))
...
> "for some" looks awful, why not "exists" or U+2203, since we are Unicode
> now? (:-))
Why? It reads as perfectly idiomatic English and is standard mathematical
phrasing.
--
Bill Findlay
with blueyonder.co.uk;
<surname><forename>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-17 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-17 0:03 Quantified Expressions: "some" Georg Bauhaus
2010-11-17 6:31 ` AdaMagica
2010-11-17 8:25 ` Niklas Holsti
2010-11-17 12:29 ` Peter C. Chapin
2010-11-17 13:38 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-11-17 10:46 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-11-17 12:05 ` (see below) [this message]
2010-11-17 13:38 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-11-17 14:16 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-11-17 14:20 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-11-17 16:14 ` J-P. Rosen
2010-11-17 17:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-11-18 1:12 ` Randy Brukardt
2010-11-18 8:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-11-18 9:48 ` AdaMagica
2010-11-18 10:07 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-11-18 10:27 ` AdaMagica
2010-11-18 13:24 ` Niklas Holsti
2010-11-18 15:51 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-11-18 17:58 ` Peter C. Chapin
2010-11-19 17:48 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-11-19 17:51 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-11-19 20:03 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2010-12-19 10:04 ` Andre
2010-11-17 11:33 ` stefan-lucks
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox