A Newbie to the group.

A Newbie to the group.

[adacrypt]

I have only just discovered your group and I must say this is a great
discovery to me –  Where have I been you might ask? – now that I’m
here I look forward to coming again often.

My interest has been in the application of Ada-95 to cryptography for
over 10 years and I can demonstrate some very powerful ciphers as the
result.  These are world firsts in being theoretically unbreakable in
class.

I have been subscribing to sci crypt news group exclusively up until
today and I have been using the pseudonym ‘adacrypt’.

I have been banging the drum so loudly for Ada-95 over there and
rattling the bars of their cages that I think I am high on some
people’s assassination list.

The good news is that there is demonstrably unbreakable cryptography
on the table that owes a lot to Ada-95.

It would be great if readers would check out my claims in today's sci
crypt group. and perhaps correct me if I am wrong in what I say - my
post over there was made oblivious of the group's existence earlier
today - adacrypt

Re: A Newbie to the group.

[Adam Beneschan]

On Jun 15, 7:51 am, adacrypt <austin.oby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I have only just discovered your group and I must say this is a great
> discovery to me –  Where have I been you might ask? – now that I’m
> here I look forward to coming again often.
>
> My interest has been in the application of Ada-95 to cryptography for
> over 10 years and I can demonstrate some very powerful ciphers as the
> result.  These are world firsts in being theoretically unbreakable in
> class.
>
> I have been subscribing to sci crypt news group exclusively up until
> today and I have been using the pseudonym ‘adacrypt’.
>
> I have been banging the drum so loudly for Ada-95 over there and
> rattling the bars of their cages that I think I am high on some
> people’s assassination list.
>
> The good news is that there is demonstrably unbreakable cryptography
> on the table that owes a lot to Ada-95.

Interesting.  I always thought that unbreakable cryptography was
related more to C to Ada.  I mean, there's a *lot* of C programs out
there that no mortal human can decode.... :) :) :) :) :)

                           -- Adam

Re: A Newbie to the group.

[adacrypt]

On Jun 15, 4:02 pm, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 7:51 am, adacrypt <austin.oby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I have only just discovered your group and I must say this is a great
> > discovery to me –  Where have I been you might ask? – now that I’m
> > here I look forward to coming again often.
>
> > My interest has been in the application of Ada-95 to cryptography for
> > over 10 years and I can demonstrate some very powerful ciphers as the
> > result.  These are world firsts in being theoretically unbreakable in
> > class.
>
> > I have been subscribing to sci crypt news group exclusively up until
> > today and I have been using the pseudonym ‘adacrypt’.
>
> > I have been banging the drum so loudly for Ada-95 over there and
> > rattling the bars of their cages that I think I am high on some
> > people’s assassination list.
>
> > The good news is that there is demonstrably unbreakable cryptography
> > on the table that owes a lot to Ada-95.
>
> Interesting.  I always thought that unbreakable cryptography was
> related more to C to Ada.  I mean, there's a *lot* of C programs out
> there that no mortal human can decode.... :) :) :) :) :)
>
>                            -- Adam- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hi adam,
There's a lot to be talked about here - may I explain my earlier
remark that this cryptography owes a lot to Ada-95 - more correctly it
owes alot to Professsor Feldman and the help he gave me at the outset
some 8 years when I choose to learn Ada-95 in order to implement my
brainwave of factoring three-dimensional vectors and using three-
dimensional space as the encryption environment in cryptography - that
had been suggested to me by an Iraqi mathematician who had read my
work in factoring vectors and I was convinced that Ada-95 was the only
language for this - I had studied Ada-83 at the University of
Liverpool but it was on a mainframe computer (student's piece of
directory) some 10 years earlier - I could handle the task of getting
started again on a PC and it was a Godsend that Professor Feldman gave
me a lot of help - I couldnt even install the compiler I was so green
with PC's - he has probaly forgotten this by now but I haven't.

Could I ask you to vist my website http://www.adacrypt.com abd have a
look at " A New Approach to Cryptography" - this is attracting alot of
interest by academic visitors.

Could you please have a look at "File Handling in Ada-95 - A
Demonstration" in today's post.

Also could I ask you to have a look at my posting in sci crypt a few
days ago called "The Winds of Change - The Three Faces of
Cryptography".

Crypto strength is not peculiar to any programming language on its own
- reference your remark about 'C' programming language(in my view) but
Ada lends itself admirably to cipher design. - adcrypt

Re: A Newbie to the group.

[Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)]

Le Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:43:49 +0200, adacrypt <austin.obyrne@hotmail.com> a  
écrit:
> Could I ask you to vist my website http://www.adacrypt.com abd have a
> look at " A New Approach to Cryptography" - this is attracting alot of
> interest by academic visitors.
Just thanks

-- 
There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check.
--# check C and WhoKnowWhat and YouKnowWho;
--# assert Ada;
--  i.e. forget about previous premises which leads to conclusion
--  and start with new conclusion as premise.

Re: A Newbie to the group.

[Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)]

Le Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:29:06 +0200, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)  
<yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> a écrit:

> Le Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:43:49 +0200, adacrypt <austin.obyrne@hotmail.com>  
> a écrit:
>> Could I ask you to vist my website http://www.adacrypt.com abd have a
>> look at " A New Approach to Cryptography" - this is attracting alot of
>> interest by academic visitors.
> Just thanks
You should also submit it to the http://www.adaic.org/ webmaster (if not  
already done).


-- 
There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check.
--# check C and WhoKnowWhat and YouKnowWho;
--# assert Ada;
--  i.e. forget about previous premises which leads to conclusion
--  and start with new conclusion as premise.

Re: A Newbie to the group.

[adacrypt]

On Jun 15, 6:29 pm, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
<yannick_duch...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Le Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:43:49 +0200, adacrypt <austin.oby...@hotmail.com> a  
> écrit:> Could I ask you to vist my websitehttp://www.adacrypt.comabd have a
> > look at " A New Approach to Cryptography" - this is attracting alot of
> > interest by academic visitors.
>
> Just thanks
>
> --
> There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check.
> --# check C and WhoKnowWhat and YouKnowWho;
> --# assert Ada;
> --  i.e. forget about previous premises which leads to conclusion
> --  and start with new conclusion as premise.

Hi,

I am a bit of a loss to interpret your meaning - Do you mean I should
promote this as something of academic interest to the refernces you
give me or is there some mistake on my part - I would appreciate it if
you enlighten me a bit - adacrypt

Re: A Newbie to the group.

[Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)]

Le Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:14:25 +0200, adacrypt <austin.obyrne@hotmail.com> a  
écrit:
> Hi,
>
> I am a bit of a loss to interpret your meaning - Do you mean I should
> promote this as something of academic interest to the refernces you
> give me or is there some mistake on my part - I would appreciate it if
> you enlighten me a bit - adacrypt
Bycause this is the first time I see an Ada job in this area, and it looks  
promising.

A little note: it seems there is a CRC error in the Ada source archive. I  
could not unpack it.
On the page http://www.adacrypt.com/computerised_pad.html
the link named “DOWNLOAD Joint Thin Tile Cryptography - Batch & Realtime  
Source Code (22Mb)”

-- 
There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check.
--# check C and WhoKnowWhat and YouKnowWho;
--# assert Ada;
--  i.e. forget about previous premises which leads to conclusion
--  and start with new conclusion as premise.

Re: A Newbie to the group.

[Non scrivetemi]

adacrypt <austin.obyrne@hotmail.com> is a confirmed idiot and menace to
society. He spams sci.crypt with his ideas, and they are always shot full
of holes in 2 minutes.

The best thing anyone can do is to killfile the stupid bastard.

Don't say I didn't warn you!

Re: A Newbie to the group.

[(see below)]

On 15/06/2010 16:43, in article
26d9422f-e704-458b-a6eb-c7ec70a28ba7@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com,
"adacrypt" <austin.obyrne@hotmail.com> wrote:

> ... I choose to learn Ada-95 in order to implement my
> brainwave of factoring three-dimensional vectors and using three-
> dimensional space as the encryption environment in cryptography - that
> had been suggested to me by an Iraqi mathematician who had read my
> work in factoring vectors and I was convinced that Ada-95 was the only
> language for this ...

Why?

-- 
Bill Findlay
<surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk

Re: A Newbie to the group.

[adacrypt]

On Jun 15, 7:11 pm, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 15/06/2010 16:43, in article
> 26d9422f-e704-458b-a6eb-c7ec70a28...@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com,
>
> "adacrypt" <austin.oby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > ... I choose to learn Ada-95 in order to implement my
> > brainwave of factoring three-dimensional vectors and using three-
> > dimensional space as the encryption environment in cryptography - that
> > had been suggested to me by an Iraqi mathematician who had read my
> > work in factoring vectors and I was convinced that Ada-95 was the only
> > language for this ...
>
> Why?
>
> --
> Bill Findlay
> <surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk

Hi,

I take you mean why did I think Ada was the more suitable language?

I had already done some casual work on factorising large numbers in
Ada-83. I had been introduced to cryptography by one Dr. Chalabi who I
had asked to read my stuff on vector factoring (see "Factoring of
Vectors in Vector Cryptography" http://www.adacrypt.com)- he was
active in cryptography - I soon saw an algorithm in vector factoring
that is a one-way function in mathematics that is imminently suitable
for cryptography - it was pure instinct from there onwards but I was
convinced that the system structures of Ada-95 were ideal for what I
wanted to do in cryptography.  The mathematical algorithm was very
transparent to me but it was going to be a problem at the time to
implement it in Ada due largely to my inexperience of programming in
Ada-95 - I repeat that mathematical instinct was the driving force -
its the only thing I claim to have in abundance - I have taught myself
enough Ada just to complete this work - I am a retired engineer and
although I revere Ada programming I have no reason to go any deeper
into it in a general way - adacrypt

Re: A Newbie to the group.

[adacrypt]

On Jun 15, 7:33 pm, adacrypt <austin.oby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 7:11 pm, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 15/06/2010 16:43, in article
> > 26d9422f-e704-458b-a6eb-c7ec70a28...@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com,
>
> > "adacrypt" <austin.oby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > ... I choose to learn Ada-95 in order to implement my
> > > brainwave of factoring three-dimensional vectors and using three-
> > > dimensional space as the encryption environment in cryptography - that
> > > had been suggested to me by an Iraqi mathematician who had read my
> > > work in factoring vectors and I was convinced that Ada-95 was the only
> > > language for this ...
>
> > Why?
>
> > --
> > Bill Findlay
> > <surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk
>
> Hi,
>
> I take you mean why did I think Ada was the more suitable language?
>
> I had already done some casual work on factorising large numbers in
> Ada-83. I had been introduced to cryptography by one Dr. Chalabi who I
> had asked to read my stuff on vector factoring (see "Factoring of
> Vectors in Vector Cryptography"http://www.adacrypt.com)-he was
> active in cryptography - I soon saw an algorithm in vector factoring
> that is a one-way function in mathematics that is imminently suitable
> for cryptography - it was pure instinct from there onwards but I was
> convinced that the system structures of Ada-95 were ideal for what I
> wanted to do in cryptography.  The mathematical algorithm was very
> transparent to me but it was going to be a problem at the time to
> implement it in Ada due largely to my inexperience of programming in
> Ada-95 - I repeat that mathematical instinct was the driving force -
> its the only thing I claim to have in abundance - I have taught myself
> enough Ada just to complete this work - I am a retired engineer and
> although I revere Ada programming I have no reason to go any deeper
> into it in a general way - adacrypt- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Also,

I have no idea how to proceed with any topic that you may think worth
expounding at some higher level - if you see any potential perhaps you
would let me know explicitly - I'm a bit slow on the uptake - adcrypt

Re: A Newbie to the group.

[(see below)]

On 15/06/2010 19:42, in article
2dfafa54-b744-4670-b85a-2d59d850a0a1@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com,
"adacrypt" <austin.obyrne@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Jun 15, 7:33�pm, adacrypt <austin.oby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 15, 7:11�pm, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 15/06/2010 16:43, in article
>>> 26d9422f-e704-458b-a6eb-c7ec70a28...@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com,
>> 
>>> "adacrypt" <austin.oby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> ... I choose to learn Ada-95 in order to implement my
>>>> brainwave of factoring three-dimensional vectors and using three-
>>>> dimensional space as the encryption environment in cryptography - that
>>>> had been suggested to me by an Iraqi mathematician who had read my
>>>> work in factoring vectors and I was convinced that Ada-95 was the only
>>>> language for this ...
>> 
>>> Why?
>> 
>>> --
>>> Bill Findlay
>>> <surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I take you mean why did I think Ada was the more suitable language?
>> 
>> I had already done some casual work on factorising large numbers in
>> Ada-83. I had been introduced to cryptography by one Dr. Chalabi who I
>> had asked to read my stuff on vector factoring (see "Factoring of
>> Vectors in Vector Cryptography"http://www.adacrypt.com)-he was
>> active in cryptography - I soon saw an algorithm in vector factoring
>> that is a one-way function in mathematics that is imminently suitable
>> for cryptography - it was pure instinct from there onwards but I was
>> convinced that the system structures of Ada-95 were ideal for what I
>> wanted to do in cryptography. �The mathematical algorithm was very
>> transparent to me but it was going to be a problem at the time to
>> implement it in Ada due largely to my inexperience of programming in
>> Ada-95 - I repeat that mathematical instinct was the driving force -
>> its the only thing I claim to have in abundance - I have taught myself
>> enough Ada just to complete this work - I am a retired engineer and
>> although I revere Ada programming I have no reason to go any deeper
>> into it in a general way - adacrypt- Hide quoted text -
>> 
>> - Show quoted text -
> 
> Also,
> 
> I have no idea how to proceed with any topic that you may think worth
> expounding at some higher level - if you see any potential perhaps you
> would let me know explicitly - I'm a bit slow on the uptake - adcrypt

You are "convinced" that Ada was in some way "ideal".
I simply ask what is it about Ada that made you consider it ideal?

-- 
Bill Findlay
<surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk

Re: A Newbie to the group.

[adacrypt]

On Jun 15, 7:50 pm, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 15/06/2010 19:42, in article
> 2dfafa54-b744-4670-b85a-2d59d850a...@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com,
>
>
>
>
>
> "adacrypt" <austin.oby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 15, 7:33 pm, adacrypt <austin.oby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jun 15, 7:11 pm, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >>> On 15/06/2010 16:43, in article
> >>> 26d9422f-e704-458b-a6eb-c7ec70a28...@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com,
>
> >>> "adacrypt" <austin.oby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> ... I choose to learn Ada-95 in order to implement my
> >>>> brainwave of factoring three-dimensional vectors and using three-
> >>>> dimensional space as the encryption environment in cryptography - that
> >>>> had been suggested to me by an Iraqi mathematician who had read my
> >>>> work in factoring vectors and I was convinced that Ada-95 was the only
> >>>> language for this ...
>
> >>> Why?
>
> >>> --
> >>> Bill Findlay
> >>> <surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk
>
> >> Hi,
>
> >> I take you mean why did I think Ada was the more suitable language?
>
> >> I had already done some casual work on factorising large numbers in
> >> Ada-83. I had been introduced to cryptography by one Dr. Chalabi who I
> >> had asked to read my stuff on vector factoring (see "Factoring of
> >> Vectors in Vector Cryptography"http://www.adacrypt.com)-hewas
> >> active in cryptography - I soon saw an algorithm in vector factoring
> >> that is a one-way function in mathematics that is imminently suitable
> >> for cryptography - it was pure instinct from there onwards but I was
> >> convinced that the system structures of Ada-95 were ideal for what I
> >> wanted to do in cryptography. The mathematical algorithm was very
> >> transparent to me but it was going to be a problem at the time to
> >> implement it in Ada due largely to my inexperience of programming in
> >> Ada-95 - I repeat that mathematical instinct was the driving force -
> >> its the only thing I claim to have in abundance - I have taught myself
> >> enough Ada just to complete this work - I am a retired engineer and
> >> although I revere Ada programming I have no reason to go any deeper
> >> into it in a general way - adacrypt- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Also,
>
> > I have no idea how to proceed with any topic that you may think worth
> > expounding at some higher level - if you see any potential perhaps you
> > would let me know explicitly - I'm a bit slow on the uptake - adcrypt
>
> You are "convinced" that Ada was in some way "ideal".
> I simply ask what is it about Ada that made you consider it ideal?
>
> --
> Bill Findlay
> <surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I need to talk around this matter for a moment - it is more important
to say why it is ideal now rather than why I saw it as being ideal at
the outset.

A salient feature of this cryptogrpahy in additon to the mathematical
algorithm that is based upon is that it uses a new concept which I
have developed that I am calling mutual database cryptography.  Mutual
database means that the entities share some several arrays of data
that are referenced i.e. indexed by the ciphertext in sequential order
that gives the data the correct structure to turn scrambled
meaningless characters into meaningful information.  This is a piece
of management technology that saves sending important vulnerable keys
in transit (a sore defect in current mainstream cryptography)so that
if an adversary manages to intercept the ciphertext , something that
always has to be assumed as inevitable and indeed certain, then he
only gets a worthless string of indexing data that is useless without
the database that it relates to.

The way this works is that the sending entity, industry standard
pseudonym Alice, prepares her encryption program with all the
necessary arrays of data that she uses to encrypt plaintext messages
into ciphertext.  She next creates the decryption program that enables
her to check her previous encryption work by decrypting it in her own
computer.  When she has tweaked this to perfection she sends an exact
copy of her joint encryption/decryption program(s) to the receiving
entity, industry standard pseudonym Bob. Clearly she is able now to
encrypt messages now and send these to Bob knowing that only Bob alone
can decrypt it because only he has an exact copy of the several arrays
of her database.  The ciphertext functions as a kind of markup
language that correctly references the mutual databases but has no
encapsulated information by way of keys within itself - it is useless
to an adversary who intercepts it - this ploy is part of my very
secure cryptpography which is further secured by other means (much
more maths later - this here is a management-orientated part topic).

It is necessary at the outset of setting up a secure loop between new
entities to make a one-off secure delivery of the copy of Alice's
database to the new Bob.  It is also necessary to expand a large
network by other such deliveries to other Bob's and so on.

To get to the point the packages of Ada are ideal for these deliveries
which may be sent by unsecured email in many cases after the initial
contact is made.  The construction of a cipher crypto system is very,
very manageable by using these packages for their portability and
compactness, for on-site scrambling, for slicing of arrays and general
all round mmanagement suitability.  They can be used as digital
signature also if needs be.  All of this topic of bears a lot of
discussion - this is just a broad outline of what is involved.

My instincts at the very outset suggested that all of this would be
serviced better by Ada than other programming languages.

I was hooked on the package as a system structure in Ada-95 from the
word go.

Cryptographers have never used this concept before now and instead
have resorted to sending secure information by transfroming the
plaintext by some mathematically functional method at encryption time
and then embedding the transformed form directly into the ciphertext
(there for the finding and inverting by some mathematical means by
illegal cryptanalysts).  I call this encapsulation cryptography (a
privately coined word).

I compare this cryptography with sending cash through the post instead
of a cheque by analogy.
I hope this is intelligible to you - adacrypt

Re: A Newbie to the group.

[(see below)]

On 15/06/2010 22:20, in article
c6e6517f-bf79-4708-81f9-2412f7fd314c@w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com,
"adacrypt" <austin.obyrne@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I hope this is intelligible to you - adacrypt

It is intelligible enough to make it clear that it is almost entirely
irrelevant to question I asked.

-- 
Bill Findlay
<surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk