From: news.crd.ge.com!e7sa!groleau@uunet.uu.net (Wes Groleau X7574)
Subject: Re: Classes vs types; what's the difference?
Date: 15 Apr 93 13:14:03 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C5J0rG.DuF@crdnns.crd.ge.com> (raw)
In article <1993Apr15.093550@lglsun.epfl.ch> magnus@lglsun.epfl.ch (Magnus Kemp
e) writes:
>So, there are good reasons not to go the "class type" way.
>Finding other reasons is left as an exercise for the readers...
Like readability, as in making it similar to a human language, and making it
somewhat descriptive of what's happening.
type roster is class record ..... :-)
next reply other threads:[~1993-04-15 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1993-04-15 13:14 Wes Groleau X7574 [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-04-16 14:25 Classes vs types; what's the difference? cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!til
1993-04-14 16:58 Charles Lindsey
1993-04-12 15:23 Michael Feldman
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox