From: Per Sandberg <per.sandberg@bredband.net>
Subject: Re: Design problem: generic package vs tagged subtype
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:14:07 +0200
Date: 2010-07-01T23:14:07+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <By7Xn.99951$tH4.45621@hurricane> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <i0is8i$4cs$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
Maybe,
But the sentence is readable for two legged carbon-based beings.
/P
On 07/01/2010 09:59 PM, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
> On 07/01/2010 12:28 PM, Simon Wright wrote:
>>
>> Quite often (IMO) there's no need to use named association *for the
>> first parameter* in a case like this.
>>
>> Send ("hello world", To => Server);
>>
>> for example.
>
> This violates my coding standard.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-01 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-30 17:52 Design problem: generic package vs tagged subtype Marek Janukowicz
2010-06-30 19:23 ` Simon Wright
2010-06-30 22:33 ` Marek Janukowicz
2010-07-01 4:13 ` naming, was " tmoran
2010-07-01 9:49 ` J-P. Rosen
2010-07-01 15:48 ` Marcelo Coraça de Freitas
2010-07-01 5:57 ` Simon Wright
2010-07-01 18:30 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2010-07-01 19:28 ` Simon Wright
2010-07-01 19:59 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2010-07-01 21:14 ` Per Sandberg [this message]
2010-07-02 9:25 ` Stephen Leake
2010-07-02 10:50 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox