re: re: re: crosstalk article on ada

re: re: re: crosstalk article on ada

["Riehle, Richard"]

Sorry to have over-reacted to the "opposing view" comments
of the Crosstalk editor.  I have heard from several of your who
read the introductory remarks more carefully than I.   Upon 
re-reading them, I realized that this article was the opposing 
view, a response to the collection of erroneous views about Ada 
in an earlier issue of Crosstalk.   Apologize for my mis-reading.

Richard Riehle



-- 
Posted from monterey.nps.navy.mil [131.120.18.26] 
via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

Re: re: re: re: crosstalk article on ada

[Ted Dennison]

In article <F5AD48747FC0324EB21B2B2BD27D5E8698B48F@Saipan>, Riehle, Richard
says...
>
>Sorry to have over-reacted to the "opposing view" comments
>of the Crosstalk editor.  I have heard from several of your who
>read the introductory remarks more carefully than I.   Upon 
>re-reading them, I realized that this article was the opposing 
>view, a response to the collection of erroneous views about Ada 
>in an earlier issue of Crosstalk.   Apologize for my mis-reading.

No need for a formal apology. Your heart was in the right place, and as I said
in my previous post, it (the "introductory remarks") was somewhat poorly
written. I doubt you were the only one confused by it.

---
T.E.D.    homepage   - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
          home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com