From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: re: re: re: crosstalk article on ada
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:41:21 GMT
Date: 2001-03-21T19:41:21+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Bt7u6.446$fy.1150@www.newsranger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: F5AD48747FC0324EB21B2B2BD27D5E8698B48F@Saipan
In article <F5AD48747FC0324EB21B2B2BD27D5E8698B48F@Saipan>, Riehle, Richard
says...
>
>Sorry to have over-reacted to the "opposing view" comments
>of the Crosstalk editor. I have heard from several of your who
>read the introductory remarks more carefully than I. Upon
>re-reading them, I realized that this article was the opposing
>view, a response to the collection of erroneous views about Ada
>in an earlier issue of Crosstalk. Apologize for my mis-reading.
No need for a formal apology. Your heart was in the right place, and as I said
in my previous post, it (the "introductory remarks") was somewhat poorly
written. I doubt you were the only one confused by it.
---
T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-21 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-21 19:06 re: re: crosstalk article on ada "Riehle, Richard"
2001-03-21 19:41 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox