From: "Ken Garlington" <Ken.Garlington@computer.org>
Subject: Re: Required Metrics
Date: 2000/05/01
Date: 2000-05-01T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BQnP4.3698$wb7.344147@news.flash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8ek4ea$5ta$1@nnrp1.deja.com
"Ted Dennison" <dennison@telepath.com> wrote in message
news:8ek4ea$5ta$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <5DDO4.2237$wb7.194854@news.flash.net>,
> "Ken Garlington" <Ken.Garlington@computer.org> wrote:
> > In the Ada Reference Manual, paragraphs D.8:37-45 states that "The
> > implementation shall document" a series of metrics related to the
> ...
> > details of that configuration." However, although my compiler's
> > reference manual claims that "The real-time systems annex is fully
> > implemented", it goes on to say " Information on metrics is not yet
> > available." Does a compiler fully implement the real-time systems
> > annex if it does not meet the documentation requirements?
>
> I remember asking almost this exact question here about a year and a
> half ago. You can search deja for the thread. But the answer I remember
> getting was that since there is (and can be) no test in the Ada
> validation test suite for documentation requirements, implementors can
> pretty much get away with murder here.
I'm not surprised, but I don't think it really answers my question. The
issue isn't, in my mind, "How easy is it for vendors to ignore certain
requirements?". It's "Is there really a requirement?" (See my response to
Tucker's post for more...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-05-01 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-04-29 0:00 Required Metrics Ken Garlington
2000-04-29 0:00 ` swhalen
2000-05-01 0:00 ` Required Metrics (GNAT et al) Ken Garlington
2000-05-01 0:00 ` swhalen
2000-05-01 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-01 0:00 ` Required Metrics Ted Dennison
2000-05-01 0:00 ` Ken Garlington [this message]
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Roger Barnett
2000-05-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-05 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-05 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-18 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-05-18 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-05-19 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-05-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-06-03 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-05-08 0:00 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2000-05-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-18 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-05-18 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-01 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-05-01 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-02 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-02 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-03 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-03 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-05 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-06 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-06 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-08 0:00 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2000-05-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
2000-05-02 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-04 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-05-05 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-05-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox