From: "James S. Rogers" <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: ADA Tasks
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 04:56:01 GMT
Date: 2002-12-02T04:56:01+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BJBG9.39458$hK4.3502699@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: a5a588a6.0212011837.5e378fd6@posting.google.com
"Khuram Imtiaz" <khurmie@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a5a588a6.0212011837.5e378fd6@posting.google.com...
> Is it possible to have tasks which contain both (entries/accepts and
> calls).Could this be a bad idea? If so, why? can someone explain it
> with a pseudo code. I would appreciate your help in this regard.
There are two fundamental ways for tasks to communicate with
each other. The oldest is the Rendezvous. The newest is
protected objects.
The Rendezvous provides direct, synchronous communication
between tasks. Protected objects allow indirect, asynchronous
communication through shared data.
There is no way to define a "call" other than an Entry or a
protected operation between tasks.
Jim Rogers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-02 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-02 2:37 ADA Tasks Khuram Imtiaz
2002-12-02 4:56 ` James S. Rogers [this message]
2002-12-02 6:56 ` Richard Riehle
2002-12-02 15:15 ` Robert A Duff
2002-12-02 15:46 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2002-12-03 14:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2002-12-03 22:06 ` Simon Wright
2002-12-04 13:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox