Re: Newbee question

[Bill Findlay <yaldnifw@blueyonder.co.uk>]

On 17/12/02 02:36, in article Y4wL9.17854$C32.275536@weber.videotron.net,
"Eric Robert" <synapzzz@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Well... Not that long ago: On some new PIC18FXX microprocessors with about
> 10 time less memory. You say: within 8us... sounds impressive... Wow! I'm
> impressed! -- It depends on what you have to do and it depends on your clock
> speed! 8us is really bad on some microprocessors. So, state your CPU and its
> clock to get me the impression that 8us is impressive. But please... don't
> try to impress newbees like me ;-)

Did you even read the post you replied to? It said:

>> In fact it is very good where CPU & resources are critical. When was
>> the last time you built a system in C++ based on a Mil-Std-1750A
>> processor (1.3MIPS) using 48kBytes of RAM and requiring an action to
>> be performed in response to an interrupt within 8us?

> I guess my point is Ada is 'restrictive' (NOT more readable -- Why is that?)

(a) Wrong and  (b) wrong.

Do you have any constructive purpose in posting here,
or are you simply trying to be disruptive?
-- 
Bill-Findlay chez blue-yonder.co.uk ("-" => "")