From: "Steve" <nospam_steved94@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: large arrays
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 05:03:28 GMT
Date: 2004-11-10T05:03:28+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Aihkd.489422$mD.61019@attbi_s02> (raw)
In-Reply-To: kNckd.488755$mD.84928@attbi_s02
I always try to read a post twice before I reply. It helps to avoid some of
my silly responses.
Steve
(The Duck)
"Jeff C r e e.m" <jcreem@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kNckd.488755$mD.84928@attbi_s02...
>
[snip]
> >
> > If I increase the first upper bound (1_132_000) I get a warning from
gnat <--
> > (3.15p) comfirmed at runtime: STORAGE_ERROR: object too large
^
> >
^
> > This means that "My_Array" is too large but of course I can declare a
^
> > second array of same dimensions and so one, i.e. it is not a problem of
^
> > total space (2Go available) neither of bound out of range, etc.
^
> >
^
> > I would be glad to understand the origin of this limit and it would be
^
> > great if somebody could tell me how to extend it.
^
> > Thanks in advance
^
> > Joel
^
> >
^
> >
^
>
^
> You dont say but I assume you are using
NAT? ----------------------------^
>
> From the GNAT RM (6.2)
[snip]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-10 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-09 19:49 large arrays Joel Lepinoux
2004-11-09 23:55 ` Jeff C r e e.m
2004-11-10 3:45 ` Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2004-11-10 3:57 ` Brian May
2004-11-10 12:47 ` Jeff C r e e.m
2004-11-10 5:03 ` Steve [this message]
2004-11-10 12:41 ` Jeff C r e e.m
2004-11-11 0:07 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox