From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: Constant array declarations are not causing a compilation error when not fully initialized.
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 02:07:28 GMT
Date: 2001-08-29T02:07:28+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A7Yi7.24748$sa.12602264@news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B8C2CA5.9D957ED@avercom.net
>how sophisticated such inevitable-run-time-error detection
>must be. In fact, Ada 95 goes further than Ada 83 in
>terms of specifying cases where inevitable-run-time-errors
>must be detected, but it clearly can't go all the way,
>as that would require the solution to the "halting" problem ;-).
Today's PC's CPU is nearly 1,000x as fast as the original. How much
of that typically goes into faster compilation (ie, bigger programs),
how much to more complex languages, and how much to increased
compile time analysis?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-29 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-23 9:03 Constant array declarations are not causing a compilation error when not fully initialized Mark Doherty
2001-08-28 23:43 ` Tucker Taft
2001-08-29 2:07 ` tmoran [this message]
2001-09-04 20:50 ` Tucker Taft
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox