From: David Starner <dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu>
Subject: Re: Book to learn GtkAda
Date: 19 Oct 2001 14:08:40 GMT
Date: 2001-10-19T14:08:40+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9qpc58$8a21@news.cis.okstate.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9qnc4s$gl7$1@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de
On 18 Oct 2001 19:56:12 GMT, Adrian Knoth <adi@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> wrote:
> David Starner <dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu> wrote:
>
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/qtada/
>> Read the page; its goal is to produce a clone, not a binding.
>
> Is this good or not? I feel glad about every vanished C(++), but OTOH
> a lot of people call Qt in the current state a supreme library.
Why produce a clone? If you want to get rid of the C++ part of it, write
something similar to it, but better. I don't see any way that one could
write a compariable library to GTK or QT with the amount of available
manpower; it's much more productive to write a binding and go make
something interesting.
--
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I saw a daemon stare into my face, and an angel touch my breast; each
one softly calls my name . . . the daemon scares me less."
- "Disciple", Stuart Davis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-19 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-17 21:29 Book to learn GtkAda Michael Bode
2001-10-18 6:43 ` David Starner
2001-10-18 8:58 ` Preben Randhol
2001-10-18 17:18 ` David Starner
2001-10-18 19:56 ` Adrian Knoth
2001-10-19 14:08 ` David Starner [this message]
2001-10-19 18:48 ` Adrian Knoth
2001-10-20 17:03 ` Florian Weimer
2001-10-19 14:20 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-19 14:30 ` David Botton
2001-10-20 2:01 ` DuckE
2001-10-20 16:34 ` David Starner
2001-10-19 9:04 ` Preben Randhol
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox