From: "Ehud Lamm" <mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il>
Subject: Re: Which docs first?
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:36:56 +0200
Date: 2001-10-17T16:36:56+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9qk58n$vlt$1@news.huji.ac.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: a2Yy7.31304$ev2.37362@www.newsranger.com
Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote in message
news:a2Yy7.31304$ev2.37362@www.newsranger.com...
> That 3% should all be annexes K and L. Having a glance at the first 2
pages of
> Annex A wouldn't hurt either, just to get an idea of what's in there.
>
I'd make that A and K, and skip L for in the beginning.
Ehud
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-17 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-15 21:17 Which docs first? Clueless
2001-10-15 21:32 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-16 12:09 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-10-16 14:15 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-15 22:03 ` Gerhard Häring
2001-10-16 15:06 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-17 14:36 ` Ehud Lamm [this message]
2001-10-15 23:24 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-10-16 19:20 ` Stephen Leake
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox