From: "Marin David Condic" <marin.condic.auntie.spam@pacemicro.com>
Subject: Re: Death by analogy Part 2 (was Re: is ada dead?)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:26:13 -0400
Date: 2001-07-10T21:26:15+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ifrtn$rq4$1@nh.pace.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B4B6F44.8C7CC353@easystreet.com
I'd agree that the "go become a supported user and all your troubles will
vanish" response to problems with a compiler are not going to get very far
if the support contract starts becomming way too expensive for the average
well-paid geek to afford. Its hard to justify a grand or two for a compiler
that maybe you don't have a revenue-generating project to pay for, let alone
a support contract that might be an order of magnitude or more larger. If
the appeal is aimed at getting me to talk my parent corporation into
spending the funds - heck! I can't even talk them into using Ada on a "real"
project to begin with! How am I going to get them to pony up for support? If
its aimed at me as a private citizen - I'm just not that wealthy.
This isn't a complaint, but it is an observation about market realities. The
businessman needs to understand how people view it and adjust the business
plan to provide something people *will* buy.
Microsoft offers basically a newsletter and quarterly updates that are
within the reach (maybe) of an independent developer. They may not be the
model to copy, but it does suggest that folks will buy a compiler with
limited support. How to get that product to the mainstream where it might
generate the critical mass? I don't know, but there is probably an answer.
If your compiler is a "sunk cost" and not generating enough revenue to make
supporting it seem worth the effort, then maybe its time to take a "We Have
Nothing To Lose" approach and put the thing out "as is" somewhere for free
or some nominal cost under $100. Or maybe it needs to be heavily donated to
schools? Or possibly value-added partners can be taken in - companies or
small-time developers who could add something to the product in exchange for
some right to re-market it? Figuring out the right answer requires a good
deal of creativity and a willingness to break the mold.
MDC
--
Marin David Condic
Senior Software Engineer
Pace Micro Technology Americas www.pacemicro.com
Enabling the digital revolution
e-Mail: marin.condic@pacemicro.com
Web: http://www.mcondic.com/
"Al Christians" <achrist@easystreet.com> wrote in message
news:3B4B6F44.8C7CC353@easystreet.com...
> It is not easy to speak from authority on this, since prices are not
> on-line to reference. And I don't want to ask about price and be a
> nuisance when I know as a rambling and scrambling 1-man consultancy I
> can't afford this stuff, anyhow, and the vendors are so nice to make
> possible freely available versions. I have paid for four Ada compilers
> in my time, from four different vendors, and none of them was over
> $2,000. But it has happened some times in the past when I pointed out
> some problems with the freely available versions of some Ada products
> here on CLA, figuring that CLA is where there are the most users and I
> might get some help, that a response came back from vendor that if I
> was a supported customer instead of a
> taker-advantage-of-the-free-goodies-when-I'm-not-even-a-studenter
> that the problems would be no problems. My natural response to such
> messages is, "OK, how much would it cost to get this fixed?", and I have
> let that response, however impertinent, issue forth from time to time.
> Then I've got to talk to sales, and it's hard even to get pre-qualified
> to talk to sales. But the prices I have been exposed to over the years
> run to the order of $1,000 per seat per month and the debugger is extra,
> I think, and then there are these minimums of six seats (last I heard,
> but I try to avoid hearing, as I said above), and when I start adding it
> all up and multiplying by the duration of the typical project, I'm into
> multiple sheets of paper and six-figures more or less, plus or minus.
>
> I'm not on CLA to argue. I don't like to argue. I don't want to argue.
> If anyone doesn't like this kind of idle babbling, they can pre-empt
> any argument by publishing a price list and posting a url. I'm not
> typing about anyone in particular. Please have mercy. I'm just trying
> to explain myself to Ed, not provoke anything, or criticize anyone's
> business model. You've got mouths to feed just as I do. Do it however
> you please. TIA for your indulgence.
>
>
> Al
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-10 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 161+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-05 21:56 is ada dead? tyler spivey
2001-07-05 23:11 ` James Rogers
2001-07-06 0:21 ` Gerhard Häring
2001-07-06 2:31 ` wzm
2001-07-06 7:47 ` Pascal Obry
2001-07-06 12:12 ` Martin Dowie
2001-07-06 21:33 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2001-07-06 14:04 ` Marin David Condic
[not found] ` <3B45E0E9.E3E7BB55@nokia.com>
2001-07-06 16:45 ` Marin David Condic
2001-07-06 18:28 ` Robert Dewar
2001-07-06 19:12 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2001-07-07 1:57 ` Adrian Hoe
2001-07-06 21:36 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2001-07-07 10:53 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-07-07 18:44 ` James Rogers
2001-07-07 21:19 ` String support (was: is Ada dead?) Larry Kilgallen
2001-07-08 3:15 ` is ada dead? Stephen J. Bevan
2001-07-08 3:46 ` James Rogers
2001-07-08 5:29 ` Stephen J. Bevan
2001-07-09 14:27 ` Marin David Condic
2001-07-08 11:07 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-07-08 14:57 ` Stephen J. Bevan
2001-07-08 13:34 ` Me
2001-07-07 18:33 ` James Rogers
2001-07-07 22:41 ` Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-07-08 0:58 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-07-09 1:33 ` Florian Weimer
2001-07-08 1:45 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-07-08 17:19 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-07-08 21:28 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-07-09 2:46 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-07-09 10:36 ` Mandating code quality (was: is Ada dead?) Larry Kilgallen
2001-07-08 10:52 ` is ada dead? Michal Nowak
2001-07-08 22:38 ` Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-07-09 1:20 ` James Rogers
2001-07-09 14:45 ` Marin David Condic
2001-07-09 15:54 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-09 20:27 ` Jerry Petrey
2001-07-09 21:08 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-14 16:49 ` Stefan Skoglund
2001-07-10 23:59 ` Why " raj
2001-07-14 16:53 ` Stefan Skoglund
2001-07-14 23:14 ` James Rogers
2001-07-15 22:57 ` Stefan Skoglund
2001-07-16 14:00 ` Trains in the US (was: Why is ada dead?) Ted Dennison
2001-07-10 23:56 ` Why is ada dead? raj
2001-07-11 2:59 ` James Rogers
2001-07-09 16:50 ` Michal Nowak
2001-07-15 18:14 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2001-07-16 15:38 ` Marin David Condic
2001-07-16 17:32 ` Mark Lundquist
2001-07-16 22:18 ` tmoran
2001-08-01 18:53 ` "first-mover (dis)advantage" (was Re: is ada dead?) Mark Lundquist
2001-08-02 15:44 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-21 16:30 ` is ada dead? Bertrand Augereau
2001-07-16 18:19 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-07-16 18:21 ` Marin David Condic
2001-07-16 20:14 ` Gary Scott
2001-07-16 18:26 ` Mark Lundquist
2001-07-16 21:21 ` Michal Nowak
2001-07-10 23:31 ` raj
2001-07-10 23:32 ` raj
2001-07-10 23:46 ` "garbage dumps are full of superior solutions" raj
2001-07-10 23:47 ` Managers believe that Ada programmers are hard to find raj
2001-07-11 9:38 ` Martin Dowie
2001-07-11 12:39 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-07-11 17:32 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-07-11 19:05 ` Pat Rogers
2001-07-07 22:37 ` is ada dead? Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-07-08 1:10 ` James Rogers
2001-07-08 1:47 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-07-08 9:01 ` Pascal Obry
2001-07-08 10:52 ` Michal Nowak
2001-07-08 22:40 ` Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-07-09 1:48 ` James Rogers
2001-07-09 15:11 ` Jerry Petrey
2001-07-09 16:14 ` Al Christians
2001-07-09 19:35 ` Death by analogy Part 1 (was Re: is ada dead?) Michael P. Card
2001-07-09 19:52 ` Death by analogy Part 2 " Michael P. Card
2001-07-09 22:07 ` Al Christians
2001-07-10 3:38 ` Michael P. Card
2001-07-10 4:54 ` Al Christians
2001-07-10 10:54 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-07-10 16:58 ` Al Christians
2001-07-10 17:58 ` William Dale
2001-07-10 18:39 ` Michael P. Card
2001-07-10 20:10 ` Ed Falis
2001-07-10 20:46 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-10 20:54 ` Ed Falis
2001-07-10 21:15 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-10 21:29 ` Ed Falis
2001-07-10 21:10 ` Al Christians
2001-07-10 21:26 ` Marin David Condic [this message]
2001-07-10 21:26 ` Ed Falis
2001-07-10 21:48 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-10 21:56 ` Marin David Condic
2001-07-11 1:59 ` Ed Falis
2001-07-11 2:38 ` DuckE
2001-07-11 21:00 ` Ed Falis
2001-07-12 1:42 ` DuckE
2001-07-12 10:54 ` UML for Ada raj
2001-07-12 8:03 ` Death by analogy Part 2 (was Re: is ada dead?) David Humphris
2001-07-13 2:43 ` DuckE
2001-07-23 21:53 ` Greg Bek
2001-07-20 7:49 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2001-07-10 20:26 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-10 20:39 ` Al Christians
2001-07-10 20:42 ` Ed Falis
2001-07-10 20:53 ` Marin David Condic
2001-07-10 21:11 ` Michael P. Card
2001-07-11 5:25 ` Ada and UML raj
2001-07-11 9:40 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2001-07-13 19:00 ` Nick Williams
2001-07-13 19:46 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-17 8:25 ` David Humphris
2001-07-16 0:56 ` Ken Garlington
2001-07-16 1:57 ` Ada and UML - Rational dropping Ada? Jeff Creem
2001-07-16 17:37 ` Ken Garlington
2001-07-17 18:59 ` Ada and UML Simon Wright
2001-07-23 14:38 ` John Kern
2001-08-04 6:29 ` Simon Wright
2001-07-11 0:25 ` Sure FIRM is lost, but really, who cares raj
2001-07-11 0:33 ` Death by analogy Part 2 (was Re: is ada dead?) Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-07-10 12:58 ` John Kern
2001-07-10 13:59 ` Marin David Condic
2001-07-10 1:21 ` is ada dead? Pat Rogers
2001-07-10 2:29 ` Al Christians
2001-07-09 1:44 ` Florian Weimer
2001-07-08 21:05 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2001-07-09 10:43 ` One True Language (was: is Ada dead?) Larry Kilgallen
2001-07-09 15:09 ` is ada dead? Ted Dennison
2001-07-14 18:40 ` Stefan Skoglund
2001-07-09 2:37 ` Adrian Hoe
2001-07-07 23:03 ` chris.danx
2001-07-09 15:22 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-09 16:13 ` chris.danx
2001-07-10 9:02 ` Emmanuel Briot
2001-07-10 10:29 ` Contributing patches to GPL Ada projects (was: Is Ada dead?) Larry Kilgallen
2001-07-10 12:44 ` Emmanuel Briot
2001-07-10 15:24 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-10 22:33 ` Robert Dewar
2001-07-11 7:46 ` Florian Weimer
2001-07-11 13:07 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-07-11 16:26 ` Robert Dewar
2001-07-11 13:41 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-11 16:30 ` Robert Dewar
2001-07-11 17:45 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-14 14:05 ` Robert Dewar
2001-07-16 15:38 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-16 17:37 ` Ken Garlington
2001-07-11 12:35 ` McDoobie
2001-07-12 8:16 ` Emmanuel Briot
2001-07-14 19:48 ` Stefan Skoglund
2001-07-15 0:16 ` McDoobie
2001-07-18 16:17 ` Stephen Leake
2001-07-18 17:55 ` Pascal Obry
2001-07-19 23:13 ` Stefan Skoglund
2001-07-20 17:05 ` Stephen Leake
2001-07-10 13:58 ` is ada dead? Ted Dennison
2001-07-10 17:04 ` Pascal Obry
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-09 21:59 Death by analogy Part 2 (was RE: is Ada dead?) Michael P. Card
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox