From: guyclaude.burger@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Reducing the cost of real-time software through a cyclic task abstraction for Ada
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 06:13:02 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2018-02-06T06:13:02-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f4aa92f-f3bf-44f8-8316-c66e7eb0f4bc@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40a33f37-7a25-4587-a80e-2ef5f7528264@googlegroups.com>
That paper is huge, no wonder no one (seems to) dares to review it. Could you make a summary, or a short exposé on why "loop delay until ..." or similar statements are not enough to implement neatly the desired semantic ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-06 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-05 0:27 Reducing the cost of real-time software through a cyclic task abstraction for Ada Shark8
2018-02-06 14:13 ` guyclaude.burger [this message]
2018-02-07 22:04 ` Simon Wright
2018-02-08 10:25 ` Mark Lorenzen
2018-02-09 21:03 ` Shark8
2018-02-07 18:25 ` Lucretia
2018-02-07 19:12 ` Shark8
2018-02-07 21:25 ` Lucretia
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox