From: "Marin David Condic" <marin.condic.auntie.spam@pacemicro.com>
Subject: Re: Leap Seconds
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:39:29 -0400
Date: 2001-05-30T15:39:30+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f347i$jo1$1@nh.pace.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: UUNHlI4GOPHY@eisner.encompasserve.org
I'm suspecting that if you add enough seconds to the clock, eventually,
those seconds become a day. The thing about leap-seconds is that they can be
positive or negative - probably going to your point about rotation about the
axis rather than around the sun. Since they started adding in leap-seconds,
they've always been positive.
In any case, my point was that your watch and my watch can both be ticking
off seconds in relative synch even though my watch says "4:30am, Tuesday"
{actually it doesn't "say" anything - you have to look at it.} and your
watch says "3:15pm, Wednesday" You can therefore safely ignore leap-seconds
and leap-years as long as all we're doing is saying "Let's meet for a beer
at Ruby Tuesdays in The Gardens Mall, Palm Beach Gardens, FL (free plug
there, guys!) in one hour, thirty two minutes and 15 seconds." As long as no
leap-seconds or leap-years happen between now and then, we're fine
(depending on traffic).
Its when you have to span over long stretches, that time and the calendar
get to be a problem. And let's please not even mention the Gregorian
calendar!
Time can be a *very* confusing business!
MDC
--
Marin David Condic
Senior Software Engineer
Pace Micro Technology Americas www.pacemicro.com
Enabling the digital revolution
e-Mail: marin.condic@pacemicro.com
Web: http://www.mcondic.com/
>
> Leap years (adding a day) compensate for the revolution of the earth
> around the sun, so we don't end up ((365/2)*(4/3)) years later with snow
> on the 4th of July in New York City.
>
> But I thought leap seconds compensated for the rotation of the earth,
> rather than its revolution around the sun, since otherwise it would
> eventually (12*60*60 leap seconds later) be very bright at midnight,
> local time at the equator.
>
> If I am going to Saturn I should not care about the rotation of the
> earth until I return.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-30 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-25 14:17 Leap Seconds Marin David Condic
2001-05-25 22:02 ` Tucker Taft
2001-05-29 14:43 ` Marin David Condic
2001-05-29 16:02 ` Ted Dennison
2001-05-29 16:46 ` Marin David Condic
2001-05-29 18:38 ` tmoran
2001-05-29 19:26 ` Marin David Condic
2001-05-30 18:20 ` Wilhelm Spickermann
2001-05-30 18:55 ` Marin David Condic
2001-05-30 23:16 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-05-31 6:34 ` Joseph P Vlietstra
2001-05-31 9:27 ` Wilhelm Spickermann
2001-05-31 15:31 ` Marin David Condic
2001-06-01 7:55 ` Wilhelm Spickermann
2001-06-01 13:34 ` Marin David Condic
2001-06-01 15:24 ` Wes Groleau
2001-06-01 16:18 ` Marin David Condic
2001-06-01 20:28 ` Wes Groleau
2001-06-04 13:54 ` Marin David Condic
2001-06-04 16:05 ` Wes Groleau
2001-06-04 16:15 ` Marin David Condic
2001-05-31 16:53 ` OT: Relativity misunderstood Wes Groleau
2001-05-31 17:20 ` Ted Dennison
2001-05-31 19:00 ` Wes Groleau
2001-06-01 6:49 ` Wilhelm Spickermann
2001-06-04 17:51 ` [OT] Black holes for interstellar travel (Re: OT: Relativity misunderstood) Jacob Sparre Andersen
2001-06-05 14:07 ` Wes Groleau
2001-05-30 0:42 ` Leap Seconds Arthur Evans Jr
2001-05-30 10:14 ` AG
2001-05-30 11:20 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-05-31 16:34 ` Wes Groleau
2001-05-30 14:00 ` Marin David Condic
2001-05-30 15:33 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-05-30 15:39 ` Marin David Condic [this message]
2001-05-31 2:01 ` Robert A Duff
2001-05-31 3:15 ` dale
2001-05-31 7:02 ` tmoran
2001-05-31 15:26 ` Marin David Condic
2001-05-31 16:39 ` Paul Storm
2001-06-02 6:40 ` Joseph P Vlietstra
2001-05-31 16:36 ` Wes Groleau
2001-05-31 18:12 ` Marin David Condic
2001-05-30 16:36 ` Darren New
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox