From: Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Aspect CPU
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:04:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2014-01-15T14:04:13-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e8a283e-997a-4409-ab3e-fe14a0904066@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lytxd5uiat.fsf@pushface.org>
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:00:26 PM UTC-8, Simon Wright wrote:
> Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > By the way, do you mind to tell which
> > section of RM showing this declarative syntax.
>
> For tasks, 9.1(2),
> http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/12rm/html/RM-9-1.html#p2
Thanks Simon. It is obviously I overlooked this section. After looking at this section carefully, paragraph 6/3 invokes my curiosity. My question is why aspect_specification is allowed in task body definition as paragraph 6/3 is repeated below for easy discussion.
task_body ::=
task body defining_identifier
[aspect_specification] is
declarative_part
begin
handled_sequence_of_statements
end [task_identifier];
Anh Vo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-15 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-15 1:56 Aspect CPU Anh Vo
2014-01-15 7:06 ` Egil H H
2014-01-15 16:54 ` Anh Vo
2014-01-15 20:00 ` Simon Wright
2014-01-15 20:18 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-01-15 22:10 ` Anh Vo
2014-01-15 22:04 ` Anh Vo [this message]
2014-01-15 23:25 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox