comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Aspect CPU
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:04:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2014-01-15T14:04:13-08:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e8a283e-997a-4409-ab3e-fe14a0904066@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lytxd5uiat.fsf@pushface.org>

On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:00:26 PM UTC-8, Simon Wright wrote:
> Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com> writes:
>  
> > By the way, do you mind to tell which
> > section of RM showing this declarative syntax.
>  
> For tasks, 9.1(2),
> http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/12rm/html/RM-9-1.html#p2
 
Thanks Simon. It is obviously I overlooked this section. After looking at this section carefully, paragraph 6/3 invokes my curiosity. My question is why aspect_specification is allowed in task body definition as paragraph 6/3 is repeated below for easy discussion.

task_body ::= 
   task body defining_identifier
        [aspect_specification] is
     declarative_part
   begin
     handled_sequence_of_statements
   end [task_identifier];

Anh Vo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-15 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-15  1:56 Aspect CPU Anh Vo
2014-01-15  7:06 ` Egil H H
2014-01-15 16:54   ` Anh Vo
2014-01-15 20:00     ` Simon Wright
2014-01-15 20:18       ` J-P. Rosen
2014-01-15 22:10         ` Anh Vo
2014-01-15 22:04       ` Anh Vo [this message]
2014-01-15 23:25         ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox