From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Subject: Re: Weird behavior with modular type
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 07:29:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2012-02-08T07:29:29-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9de383d1-b855-42f5-b112-cd4e7250e326@q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: jgt65l$tvv$1@dont-email.me
On Feb 7, 10:53 pm, "J-P. Rosen" <ro...@adalog.fr> wrote:
> Le 07/02/2012 19:21, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) a écrit :
>
> > I still can't explain the first and the second interpretation. In the
> > first case “10 ** I” seems to be interpreted as “(10 ** I) mod 256” and
> > “Natural'Pos (10 ** I)” seems not.
>
> /operations/ of modular type wrap, and only operations. In the first
> case, there is an operation (**). In the second case, there is none (the
> ** is on Universal_Integer, which is not a modular type).
>
> Static expressions have to belong statically to their type, so it seems
> correct to me.
Except that there's no static expression here.
-- Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-08 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 17:24 Weird behavior with modular type Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-02-07 17:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2012-02-07 18:06 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-02-07 18:21 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-02-08 6:53 ` J-P. Rosen
2012-02-08 15:29 ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
2012-02-09 3:37 ` Randy Brukardt
2012-02-07 18:15 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-02-07 17:53 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-02-07 17:54 ` Gautier write-only
2012-02-07 18:23 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-02-09 3:40 ` Randy Brukardt
2012-02-07 18:02 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-02-07 18:32 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-02-07 18:13 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-02-07 18:15 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-02-07 18:35 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-02-07 18:40 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-02-07 19:22 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox