From: gpriv@axonx.com
Subject: GNAT.Sockets: Timeval_Duration is in milliseconds?
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:45:34 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2007-12-08T11:45:34-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d687056-c98b-405a-b166-afddac34f109@e67g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> (raw)
Hello,
I find it somewhat misleading that Timeout values use different scale
than Ada duration while share that type (not Ada way). Is there a
purpose in that (other than direct translation in socket library). It
does cost some headache to figure that out and it would be more
appropriate in Ada style to make a new type for timeouts or scale it
back to seconds. Anyone would agree?
George
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-08 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-08 19:45 gpriv [this message]
2007-12-08 22:11 ` GNAT.Sockets: Timeval_Duration is in milliseconds? Simon Wright
2007-12-08 22:34 ` gpriv
2007-12-09 1:45 ` tmoran
2007-12-09 9:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-12-09 12:50 ` Gautier
2007-12-09 13:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-12-09 14:59 ` Martin Krischik
2007-12-09 17:24 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-12-09 15:55 ` gpriv
2007-12-09 17:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-12-09 18:26 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-09 19:36 ` gpriv
2007-12-09 22:51 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-09 23:27 ` gpriv
2007-12-10 20:06 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-10 21:02 ` gpriv
2007-12-11 20:33 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-13 3:44 ` gpriv
2007-12-13 13:13 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-13 14:32 ` gpriv
2007-12-09 19:46 ` tmoran
2007-12-09 9:01 ` Martin Krischik
2007-12-09 9:32 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox