From: sjw <simon.j.wright@mac.com>
Subject: Re: API design problem - buffer scatter I/O
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:39:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2008-11-26T12:39:57-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9bfc2704-d22f-4614-93f1-7ad381f96540@k19g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2559d62b-68bb-4107-9e6b-75f77114908f@d23g2000yqc.googlegroups.com
On Nov 26, 8:34 am, Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Of course, you could still argue that in the case of real I/O it might
> be done with just a sequence of separate I/O calls for each involved
> buffer, so again scatter operation is not necessary, but then the
> counterargument would be for example atomicity of the whole data
> transfer. And so on.
And is quite unlikely to work for UDP (you have to send/receive the
whole datagram in one go ..)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-26 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-22 16:05 API design problem - buffer scatter I/O Maciej Sobczak
2008-11-22 16:54 ` sjw
2008-11-22 19:43 ` george.priv
2008-11-22 22:16 ` Robert A Duff
2008-11-22 23:34 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-11-23 0:01 ` Robert A Duff
2008-11-24 8:10 ` Brad Moore
2008-11-24 7:55 ` christoph.grein
2008-11-24 20:03 ` Robert A Duff
2008-11-25 5:59 ` christoph.grein
2008-11-25 8:34 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-11-25 14:25 ` Robert A Duff
2008-11-25 22:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-11-24 21:23 ` Robert A Duff
2008-11-22 23:01 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-11-23 5:57 ` anon
2008-11-24 17:16 ` tmoran
2008-11-26 8:34 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-11-26 20:39 ` sjw [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox