From: "Jean-Pierre Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: Problem with intertask comm
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 19:10:47 +0200
Date: 2001-04-13T19:10:47+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b7c0d$qi7$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3aDB6.5240$FY5.383904@www.newsranger.com
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 762 bytes --]
"Ted Dennison" <dennison@telepath.com> a �crit dans le message news:
3aDB6.5240> As a separate issue, you might want to consider a setup where
tasks don't get
> [...] Generally its a Bad Thing to go around destroying
> task type objects and creating new ones repeatedly. Ada has to keep some
> information about deallocated tasks around so that stuff like 'terminated
will
> work. That can cause a memory leak [...]
This used to be true in Ada83 due to the so-called (hmm) Rosen's Pathology.
It has been cured in Ada95. It was related to a function returning a local
task object, which is no more allowed.
--
---------------------------------------------------------
J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-13 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-12 17:58 Problem with intertask comm Tom De Muer
2001-04-12 18:38 ` tmoran
2001-04-12 21:38 ` Ted Dennison
2001-04-12 22:06 ` Tom De Muer
2001-04-12 23:41 ` tmoran
2001-04-13 13:28 ` Ted Dennison
2001-04-13 17:10 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox