Re: Accessibility checks

[ake.ragnar.dahlgren@gmail.com]

Den torsdagen den 18:e juli 2013 kl. 02:39:42 UTC+2 skrev Bill Findlay:
> On 18/07/2013 00:44, in article ks7a8v$4nj$1@loke.gir.dk, "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> wrote: > "Jeffrey Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org> wrote in message > news:ks718g$aim$2@dont-email.me... >> Brukardt, ARG member and editor of the ARM, claims that 'Access never >> works and 'Unchecked_Access is always required, bypassing the >> accessibility checks. While this is not entirely true, it's quite common >> that one must use 'Unchecked_Access, so we could do without these rules >> and checks in the majority of cases. > > That's not entirely true: I did find one (and only one) instance where I was > able to use 'Access in my code (it had to do with a library-level > initialization). Interesting. My projects have 37 occurrences of 'Access and only 2 of 'Unchecked_Access. -- Bill Findlay with blueyonder.co.uk; use surname & forename;

Perhaps your projects use anonymous access types?

Best regards,
Åke Ragnar Dahlgren