From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ada and Its Image
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2011-04-18T17:28:49-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a25329d-44a0-47e2-9aff-e30e239f9f0b@z37g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87fwpgvwym.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org
On Apr 18, 2:29 am, Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:
> George <mail2geo...@gmx-topmail.de> writes:
> > Hi All,
> > Ada is suitable to be used as a language for software design (http://
> > ) and small apps like life-science services running on smart phones
> > requiring stability and correctness.
>
> On top of a fragile, bug-ridden smart phone operating system?
Isn't that all the more reason to use a strongly-typed, high-integrity
(lots of error checking) sort of language like Ada?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-19 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-18 5:52 Ada and Its Image George
2011-04-18 7:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-04-18 8:47 ` Brian Drummond
2011-04-18 10:49 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-04-18 11:29 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-04-18 11:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-04-18 7:29 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-04-19 0:28 ` Shark8 [this message]
2011-04-19 9:53 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-04-18 20:05 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox