From: "Marin David Condic" <marin.condic.auntie.spam@pacemicro.com>
Subject: Re: re: crosstalk article on ada
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:08:25 -0500
Date: 2001-03-20T20:08:43+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <998dcb$osv$1@nh.pace.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: c2Ot6.1990$94.2906@www.newsranger.com
My reading of the blurb at the front seems to indicate that the "opposing
view" thing was a quote from the original article and that this was the
"opposing view" article that followed.
MDC
--
Marin David Condic
Senior Software Engineer
Pace Micro Technology Americas www.pacemicro.com
Enabling the digital revolution
e-Mail: marin.condic@pacemicro.com
Web: http://www.mcondic.com/
"Ted Dennison" <dennison@telepath.com> wrote in message
news:c2Ot6.1990$94.2906@www.newsranger.com...
> In article <F5AD48747FC0324EB21B2B2BD27D5E8698B48C@Saipan>, Riehle,
Richard
> says...
> >
> >Before we become too excited by the excellent article written by Ben
Brosgol
> >and published in Crosstalk, we need to watch for the rebuttal promised by
> >the
> >editor in the Editor's Notes.
> ..
> >Now. I am wondering who is writing the "opposing view" for the future
issue
> >of Crosstalk.
>
> I thought this *was* the "opposing view", with the article in the previous
issue
> being the original view. The previous article had a very similar blurb on
it, so
> I figured this was just the same blurb (badly) reworded a smidge to
indicate
> that this is the promised second article. Am I misreading things?
>
> ---
> T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
> home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-20 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-20 18:51 crosstalk article on ada "Riehle, Richard"
2001-03-20 19:18 ` Ted Dennison
2001-03-20 20:08 ` Marin David Condic [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox