* IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ?
@ 2016-09-16 20:58 Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-17 14:12 ` Per Sandberg
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Norte Moraes @ 2016-09-16 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi!
Are There alternatives to gnat.sockets ( with ipv6 and udp ) ?
Thanks in Advance!
[]'s Dani.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ?
2016-09-16 20:58 IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ? Daniel Norte Moraes
@ 2016-09-17 14:12 ` Per Sandberg
2016-09-17 18:08 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Per Sandberg @ 2016-09-17 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
Why do you need another socket binding ????
Den 2016-09-16 kl. 22:58, skrev Daniel Norte Moraes:
> Hi!
>
> Are There alternatives to gnat.sockets ( with ipv6 and udp ) ?
>
> Thanks in Advance!
>
> []'s Dani.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ?
2016-09-16 20:58 IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ? Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-17 14:12 ` Per Sandberg
@ 2016-09-17 18:08 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-18 20:33 ` Stephen Leake
2016-09-18 21:56 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Norte Moraes @ 2016-09-17 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
sexta-feira, 16 de Setembro de 2016 às 17:58:49 UTC-3, Daniel Norte Moraes escreveu:
> Hi!
>
> Are There alternatives to gnat.sockets ( with ipv6 and udp ) ?
>
> Thanks in Advance!
>
> []'s Dani.
yes. ada.sockets dont permit 'bind' with ipv6.
Thanks in Advance!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ?
2016-09-17 18:08 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
@ 2016-09-18 20:33 ` Stephen Leake
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Leake @ 2016-09-18 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 1:09:00 PM UTC-5, Daniel Norte Moraes wrote:
> sexta-feira, 16 de Setembro de 2016 às 17:58:49 UTC-3, Daniel Norte Moraes escreveu:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Are There alternatives to gnat.sockets ( with ipv6 and udp ) ?
> >
> > Thanks in Advance!
> >
> > []'s Dani.
>
> yes. ada.sockets dont permit 'bind' with ipv6.
>
> Thanks in Advance!
GNAT GPL 2016 GNAT.Sockets has support for ipv6 addresses.
So perhaps you need to upgrade.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ?
2016-09-16 20:58 IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ? Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-17 14:12 ` Per Sandberg
2016-09-17 18:08 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
@ 2016-09-18 21:56 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-19 17:04 ` jrmarino
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Norte Moraes @ 2016-09-18 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi!
Gnat gpl 2016 gnat.sockets have ipv6 But only for 'connect'. I printed all sources and related sources just to discover => 'bind()' have a big 'raise exception' if the address is in ipv6. this was a unpleasant surprise.
my system use a ipv6+ipv4(in same network port, using ipv4 coded in ipv6[eg: ::ffff:1.2.3.4 ]). Without this, gnat.sockets ( a great initial promise) become useless to me. Well... Patience. :-)
[]'s Dani
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ?
2016-09-16 20:58 IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ? Daniel Norte Moraes
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-18 21:56 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
@ 2016-09-19 17:04 ` jrmarino
2016-09-19 22:36 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-20 23:51 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jrmarino @ 2016-09-19 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
Have you seen ANet ?
https://codelabs.ch/anet/index.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ?
2016-09-16 20:58 IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ? Daniel Norte Moraes
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-19 17:04 ` jrmarino
@ 2016-09-19 22:36 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-20 23:51 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Norte Moraes @ 2016-09-19 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
sexta-feira, 16 de Setembro de 2016 às 17:58:49 UTC-3, Daniel Norte Moraes escreveu:
> Hi!
>
> Are There alternatives to gnat.sockets ( with ipv6 and udp ) ?
>
> Thanks in Advance!
>
> []'s Dani.
Very Very Thanks Jrmarino!
I'll try it.
[]'s Dani.
p.s.: in this meantime, I'll like others suggestions.
Thanks All for all in Advance.
[]'s Dani.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ?
2016-09-16 20:58 IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ? Daniel Norte Moraes
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-19 22:36 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
@ 2016-09-20 23:51 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Norte Moraes @ 2016-09-20 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
sexta-feira, 16 de Setembro de 2016 às 17:58:49 UTC-3, Daniel Norte Moraes escreveu:
> Hi!
>
> Are There alternatives to gnat.sockets ( with ipv6 and udp ) ?
>
> Thanks in Advance!
>
> []'s Dani.
Hi! Jrmarino, Stephen. Per Sandberg!
Libanet fulfills my need.
Thanks !!!!!!!!!!!! :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-20 23:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-16 20:58 IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ? Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-17 14:12 ` Per Sandberg
2016-09-17 18:08 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-18 20:33 ` Stephen Leake
2016-09-18 21:56 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-19 17:04 ` jrmarino
2016-09-19 22:36 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-20 23:51 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox