From: claveman@cod.nosc.mil (Charles H. Sampson)
Subject: Re: Code Generation Question
Date: 19 Mar 2001 18:49:50 GMT
Date: 2001-03-19T18:49:50+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <995kce$3mm$1@newpoisson.nosc.mil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 995iub$3e0$1@newpoisson.nosc.mil
Jim Gleason of Green Hills has just pointed out to me by email that
the Atomic pragma will probably do what I want. I think it might be
pretty expensive for us, but I'm one of those who believe that expense
in writing long-lived code is usually irrelevant.
So, if Atomic works I'm now in an odd position. I'll have to argue
that the 16-but requirement is not a problem for us Ada users but that
it could be severe in other languages.
Charlie
--
******
For an email response, my user name is "csampson" and my host
is "csc.com".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-19 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-17 1:55 Code Generation Question Charles H. Sampson
2001-03-17 7:39 ` Simon Wright
2001-03-17 11:16 ` Florian Weimer
2001-03-17 12:36 ` David Kristola
2001-03-17 11:54 ` Jeff Creem
2001-03-17 15:00 ` DuckE
2001-03-19 16:10 ` Brian Orpin
2001-03-19 18:25 ` Charles H. Sampson
2001-03-19 18:49 ` Charles H. Sampson [this message]
2001-03-20 9:23 ` Stuart Palin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox