From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Subject: Re: A proposal for Debian policy for Ada
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 02:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2010-05-18T02:53:05-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <982f31af-6db1-4949-8e62-0efb3c034dd2@o15g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 128sk4lf7e74o.exterpadd849$.dlg@40tude.net
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote on comp.lang.ada:
> On Tue, 18 May 2010 04:00:40 -0400, Stephen Leake wrote:
>> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
>
>>> BTW, is it possible to have one united Ada policy for all Linux
>>> distributions?
>
>> First you have to enumerate "all Linux distributions"; I don't know how
>> to do that.
>
> That's simple: all distributions having GNAT on the list. (In effect GNAT
> is the only Linux Ada compiler)
You have reduced the problem to a smaller sub-problem but not solved
the sub-problem, thereby showing that it is not as "simple" as you
claim it is.
>>> Linux Ada community is small, all people are known.
>
>> Known to whom?
>
> to anybody reading c.l.a?
>>> Can't we use this as an advantage here?
>
>> It might be possible, if we can get everyone together.
>
>> Certainly Linux distributions that are derived from Debian should simply
>> use the Debian Ada policy.
>
>> We could define "Linux Ada community" as "people who respond to this
>> post"; that is at least a practical working definition. I doubt it
>> matches reality.
>
> [Wondering] Is it possible that there exist GNAT distribution maintainers,
> who do not read c.l.a? They must be experienced Ada programmers in order to
> be able to do that job. There is not that many other Ada resources on the
> Web. I would be happy if there were a conspiracy for Ada, driven by some
> top secret agents, but a more realistic hypothesis is that "we" indeed know
> these people.
The Linux Ada community is small but still larger than the
comp.lang.ada community; there are many web forums where newbies who
have never heard of Usenet ask questions about Ada and GNAT on GNU/
Linux.
In the thread "One united Ada policy for all Linux distributions?" I
enumerated the GNAT distribution maintainers that I know about; you
will see that few of them read comp.lang.ada (of if they do, they are
very silent about it).
Personally I think they should participate on comp.lang.ada if only
occasionally to make their work known. But the fact is they don't.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-18 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-16 19:49 A proposal for Debian policy for Ada Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-05-16 20:48 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-05-16 21:15 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-05-16 22:05 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-05-17 6:01 ` Stephen Leake
2010-05-17 9:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-05-17 10:02 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-05-17 13:14 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-05-18 8:00 ` Stephen Leake
2010-05-18 8:39 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-05-18 9:53 ` Ludovic Brenta [this message]
2010-05-18 12:39 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-05-19 9:25 ` Stephen Leake
2010-05-19 9:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-05-20 10:45 ` Stephen Leake
2010-05-20 14:06 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-05-19 13:24 ` Björn Persson
2010-05-19 9:22 ` Stephen Leake
2010-05-19 9:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-05-19 10:41 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-05-19 12:23 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-05-19 13:21 ` Ludovic Brenta
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox