From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Parallel_Simulation
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:18:50 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2013-02-25T10:18:50-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <973a091e-4650-41d8-bddf-f229abcb5adc@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <kgg6b2$kma$1@ccpntc8.in2p3.fr>
On Monday, February 25, 2013 11:17:23 AM UTC-6, Vincent LAFAGE wrote:
>
> Would you think of another way?
Well, you could forgo the independent RNG requirement and make a protected object that is say a stack filled with random values and is replenished as-needed.
OR you could have your different RNGs nested into the task itself (say the declaration area) -- then make the seed value take values from the protected object above.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-25 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-25 10:20 Parallel_Simulation Vincent LAFAGE
2013-02-25 12:40 ` Parallel_Simulation John B. Matthews
2013-02-25 17:17 ` Parallel_Simulation Vincent LAFAGE
2013-02-25 18:18 ` Shark8 [this message]
2013-02-26 7:20 ` Parallel_Simulation Vincent LAFAGE
2013-02-25 18:30 ` Parallel_Simulation John B. Matthews
2013-02-26 7:13 ` Parallel_Simulation Vincent LAFAGE
2013-02-25 21:04 ` Parallel_Simulation Simon Wright
2013-02-25 21:40 ` Parallel_Simulation gautier_niouzes
2013-02-26 7:09 ` Parallel_Simulation Vincent LAFAGE
2013-02-28 11:47 ` Parallel_Simulation John B. Matthews
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox