From: "John Griffiths" <John@NOSPaMwhere-uk.ltd.uk>
Subject: Re: Ada vs. C++ in defense projects
Date: 2000/11/06
Date: 2000-11-06T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <973539823.2970.0.nnrp-13.d4f02ffb@news.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8u2o3d$hft$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Question : has the (any,all) JVM been validated for safety critical
applications?
TTFN John
"Robert Dewar" <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8u2o3d$hft$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <3A04C67F.FEB1D90A@netwood.net>,
> "E. Robert Tisdale" <edwin@netwood.net> wrote:
> > If you can find an Ada compiler which emits byte code for a
> > JVM,
> > you may be able to convince them that they should implement
> > safety critical applications in Ada instead of Java.
> > Otherwise, you should probably just forget about Ada.
<snip/>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-06 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-03 0:00 Ada vs. C++ in defense projects michael_p_card
2000-11-04 0:00 ` Tom Hargraves
2000-11-05 2:31 ` E. Robert Tisdale
2000-11-04 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-11-05 4:35 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-05 5:42 ` E. Robert Tisdale
2000-11-05 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2000-11-06 0:00 ` John Griffiths [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-10-30 16:04 Is the Ada World Embarrassed by the Defense Industry? Ken Garlington
2000-10-30 21:36 ` E. Robert Tisdale
2000-10-31 4:10 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2000-10-31 16:50 ` mjsilva
2000-11-03 0:00 ` Ada vs. C++ in defense projects Michael P. Card
2000-11-04 0:00 ` Jeff Stimson
2000-11-04 0:00 ` Robert Love
2000-11-04 0:00 ` E. Robert Tisdale
2000-11-05 0:57 ` Jeff Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox