From: "Marin David Condic, 561.796.8997, M/S 731-96" <condicma@PWFL.COM>
Subject: Why it was a bad idea to drop The Mandate.
Date: 1997/12/08
Date: 1997-12-08T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97120812101591@psavax.pwfl.com> (raw)
Joe Gwinn <gwinn@RES.RAY.COM> writes WRT Re: fixed point vs floating point
>And, I really don't see why it's necessary to deny the failings of
>compilers that have been obsolete for at least a decade, for a now
>superceeded language. Surely we can find something more current and
>relevant to worry about, to argue about.
>
Now y'all know that Emmett Paige, et alia all stood up at the last
TriAda and said "No!No!No!No!No!No! Just because we dropped The
Mandate doesn't mean we're abandoning Ada!" One can argue forever
about the rationality of imposing The Mandate in the first place.
Once it was there, dropping it created *exactly* the perceptions
Mr Gwinn and *numerous* others have expressed:
"for a now superceeded (sic) language"
Everybody in the trenches "knows" that Ada has been abandoned,
that the DoD doesn't want to have anything to do with it anymore,
that *all* Defense software is now going to be written in C++,
that the Earth is flat and that next week Microsoft will be
announcing its new angle-trisecting software.
Will this perception *ever* change? Its sad to think that for all
the merits of the language, Ada has down through its history
suffered from problems of *perception* and not of reality. (Short
of the reality that it can't overcome perception and achieve
widespread acceptance.) The unfortunate thing is that creating and
believing the incorrect perceptions has the exact impact of
creating the corresponding reality.
Is there any hope of correcting the misperceptions? Is the only
way to do this to get the govt to spend a billion or so on a
Madison Avenue styled advertising campaign? Or talk Microsoft or
Sun into doing this for them? I'm beginning to believe that the
only way to pull the fat out of the fire is with a massive ad
campaign like the "Intel Inside" or ADM campaigns to get CEO's,
Presidents, Managers and the general public to become "Ada Aware".
Maybe we get some Hollywood types to wear little green ribbons at
award ceremonies? The problem is identifying the stakeholder. Who
has enough of a vested interest in Ada to be willing to spend that
kind of money to protect the investment?
I wish I knew what to do at this stage to help promote the
language and correct the erroneous perceptions and preconceived
notions that seem to have haunted Ada from the beginning. We've
got a big investment in Ada technology and I'd hate to be forced
to scrap this in favor of some inferior language simply because of
a lack of "critical mass" necessary to sustain things the way they
are.
MDC
Marin David Condic, Senior Computer Engineer Voice: 561.796.8997
Pratt & Whitney GESP, M/S 731-96, P.O.B. 109600 Fax: 561.796.4669
West Palm Beach, FL, 33410-9600 Internet: CONDICMA@PWFL.COM
===============================================================================
Glendower: "I can call spirits from the vasty deep."
Hotspur: "Why so can I, or so can any man; but will they come when
you do call for them?"
-- Shakespeare, "Henry IV"
===============================================================================
next reply other threads:[~1997-12-08 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-12-08 0:00 Marin David Condic, 561.796.8997, M/S 731-96 [this message]
1997-12-09 0:00 ` Why it was a bad idea to drop The Mandate Jon S Anthony
1997-12-10 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
1997-12-11 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1997-12-12 0:00 ` Robert Munck
1997-12-15 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1997-12-15 0:00 ` Robert Munck
1997-12-14 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1997-12-15 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1997-12-18 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1997-12-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox