From: "Sploo" <sploo@lineone.net>
Subject: Re: A (hopefully) interesting question...
Date: 2000/10/06
Date: 2000-10-06T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <970819156.16816.0.nnrp-12.d4f021c1@news.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8ria8u$b55$1@nnrp1.deja.com
> Your real-time OS (You will be using a real-time OS right? They aren't
> *that* stupid are they?) should have lots of intertask/process
> communications primitives of various levels of abstraction. You'll just
> have to acquaint yourself with what process/tasking kenel your OS is
> using, how it schedules, and what communications and synchronization
> primitives are available.
Yup. Some of the stuff I've been looking at supports features such as
Queues, Pipes, Semaphores, Signals and Events. Just seems a lot simpler in
Ada...
> Good luck. I give you about 2 weeks before you start seriously annyoing
> everyone by repeating "in Ada this would have been *so* much easier"
> every 10 minutes. :-)
Most probably. But then I'd get beaten with the Kernighan & Ritchie ANSI C
book :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-06 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-05 0:00 A (hopefully) interesting question Sploo
2000-10-05 0:00 ` Gautier
2000-10-06 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
2000-10-05 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-10-06 0:00 ` Sploo [this message]
2000-10-06 0:00 ` Scott Ingram
2000-10-06 6:52 ` Pierre Dissaux
2000-10-06 0:00 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2000-10-06 0:00 ` Sploo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox