From: "W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)" <wwgrol@PSESERV3.FW.HAC.COM>
Subject: Re: debugger debate (was: any research...)
Date: 1997/04/22
Date: 1997-04-22T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9704221332.AA06103@most> (raw)
> ... debuggers ... are hardly ever necessary if the code ia
> properly designed. Either the bug will not occur ... or it
> will obviously be in module 'x' function 'y' .....
> ... many programmers use a debugger to watch what their code is doing
> as a replacement for understanding it.
But those of us that congratulate ourselves for not needing a debugger
most of the time can end up embarassed when we do need it and don't know
how to operate it! (Voice of experience...)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
W. Wesley Groleau (Wes) Office: 219-429-4923
Hughes Defense Communications (MS 10-41) Home: 219-471-7206
Fort Wayne, IN 46808 (Unix): wwgrol@pseserv3.fw.hac.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~1997-04-22 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-04-22 0:00 W. Wesley Groleau (Wes) [this message]
1997-04-25 0:00 ` debugger debate (was: any research...) William Frye
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox