From: "Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com>
Subject: Re: The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:02:09 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2002-04-23T06:02:09+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <968e030edcfa04f151d8e5af4130bdd6.48257@mygate.mailgate.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3CC4D85D.9080108@worldnet.att.net
"Jim Rogers" <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> I would appreciate it if you would restrict your invictives to
> private communication with the person with whom you have a
> problem.
If you bother to _read_ what I posted, you will feel like a total fool.
Not, particularly, that it was my intent to cause you to do so, you did
that by yourself.
xanthian.
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-23 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-23 3:11 The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 3:43 ` Jim Rogers
2002-04-23 6:02 ` Kent Paul Dolan [this message]
2002-04-23 12:33 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-23 3:51 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Kent Paul Dolan Larry Kilgallen
2002-04-23 6:05 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 10:21 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-05-01 12:59 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-23 3:54 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Eric G. Miller
2002-04-23 6:12 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 6:20 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 11:48 ` chris.danx
2002-04-23 13:08 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2002-04-23 16:36 ` The inscrutable ethics of KPD and RC Wes Groleau
2002-04-27 17:54 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Keith Thompson
2002-04-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox