From: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT not in gcc-3.0?
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 05:14:05 GMT
Date: 2001-02-10T05:14:05+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <962imr$cna$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m3hf23uuid.fsf_-_@yakisoba.forte-intl.com
In article <m3hf23uuid.fsf_-_@yakisoba.forte-intl.com>,
Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com> wrote:
> I'd have sworn that Robert said that GNAT was going to be in
gcc-3.0, but
> by the looks of the official web page, it isn't:
>
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/criteria.html>
We are discussing now whether to put GNAT into 3.0 or wait
till just after. The issue is to work out whether there is
a risk of destabilizing the release. Richard and Mark are
working out the best approach.
Robert could hardly have specifically promised that GNAT would
go into GCC 3.0 because (a) there was no firm release schedule
at that time anyway and (b) Robert is not the GCC release
manager :-)
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-10 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-07 19:12 Searching for HP GNAT Binaries Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2001-02-07 19:42 ` Ted Dennison
2001-02-07 20:32 ` Searching for HP GNAT Binaries (found) Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2001-02-09 23:39 ` Searching for HP GNAT Binaries Richard Kenner
2001-02-10 2:44 ` GNAT not in gcc-3.0? Ronald Cole
2001-02-10 5:14 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2001-02-07 20:26 ` Searching for HP GNAT Binaries Britt Snodgrass
2001-02-07 21:24 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox