From: axtens <Bruce.Axtens@gmail.com>
Subject: SPITBOL question (GNAT related)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:40:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2007-11-20T00:40:24-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9607825a-d085-4a0f-a4bb-54ffda8d54ec@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com> (raw)
G'day everyone,
I'm confused by some legalese in the headers for the SPITBOL routines,
namely:
-- As a special exception, if other files instantiate generics from
this --
-- unit, or you link this unit with other files to produce an
executable, --
-- this unit does not by itself cause the resulting executable
to be --
-- covered by the GNU General Public License. This exception
does not --
-- however invalidate any other reasons why the executable file
might be --
-- covered by the GNU Public
License. --
What does this actually mean?
I'm curious because I want to use the spitbol routines in a commercial
package. The idea is to take the code, make it UTF-16 aware, compile
it to a DLL and then use that DLL in my employer's software.
I'm quite happy, and my employer is also, to release the modified code
back into the wild.
Kind regards,
Bruce.
next reply other threads:[~2007-11-20 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-20 8:40 axtens [this message]
2007-11-20 11:54 ` SPITBOL question (GNAT related) Samuel Tardieu
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox