From: "Tomas Brixi" <brixi@unicode.cz>
Subject: Re: Why isn't there Visual Ada?
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:08:30 +0100
Date: 2001-02-06T08:15:09+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95obqd$ecd$1@news.nextra.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Q8cJw$sOAAHD@eisner.decus.org
"Larry Kilgallen" <Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam> wrote in message
news:Q8cJw$sOAAHD@eisner.decus.org...
> In article
<732FACF8BF7E8D79.8125E7BE5B617E0B.B3DBC49334E8E3C4@lp.airnews.net>, Robert
Love <rlove@neosoft.com> writes:
> >>>>>> "LK" == Larry Kilgallen <Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam> writes:
> >
> >
> > LK> What do you find missing from the ObjectAda product ?
> >
> > A Linux version.
>
> I didn't know there was a Visual C++ for Linux.
Moreover Visual C++ is not so "visual" as it announce itself :-)
(comparing to e.g. c++ builder)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-06 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <94jki1$eha$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
[not found] ` <u7l3kaavl.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
[not found] ` <3A70172C.B1D91123@earthlink.net>
2001-01-26 15:54 ` Why isn't there Visual Ada? - historical note Britt Snodgrass
2001-01-26 21:41 ` Randy Brukardt
2001-01-26 22:15 ` Pascal Obry
2001-02-07 19:21 ` aschw1309
[not found] ` <DTr7BCXE70f+@eisner.decus.org>
2001-01-27 3:17 ` Why isn't there Visual Ada? Robert Love
2001-01-27 23:47 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-02-06 8:08 ` Tomas Brixi [this message]
2001-02-07 15:58 ` Buz Cory
2001-02-07 17:02 ` David Starner
2001-02-08 9:56 ` Florian Weimer
2001-02-08 9:54 ` Florian Weimer
2001-02-08 13:20 ` David Starner
2001-02-08 20:32 ` Florian Weimer
2001-02-08 21:06 ` David Starner
2001-02-09 8:31 ` Tarjei T. Jensen
2001-02-09 15:39 ` David Starner
2001-02-09 22:20 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-01-26 18:05 Beard, Frank
2001-01-27 1:52 ` John English
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox