From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 03:48:27 GMT
Date: 2001-02-02T03:48:27+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95dama$1gk$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 95ctlj$ff437$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de
In article <95ctlj$ff437$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de>,
"Nick Roberts" <nickroberts@callnetuk.com> wrote:
> PS: Yes I realise that there's not going to be a revision so
> this kind of idle speculation is pointless, and yes I realise
> people with nohing better to do ;-) will have a field day
> picking it apart. Sigh.
This is a misconception, no one could say at this stage when
the next revision of the Ada standard might be, but in any case
well conceived proposals can be considered as amendment AI's
by the ARG right now, without waiting for a new revision to be
in view. I will not comment on whether I consider this
particular proposal to be well conceived, I will leave that
to others.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-02 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-20 7:26 Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-01-20 14:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-20 16:19 ` Jeff Creem
2001-01-20 16:23 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-20 19:18 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-20 22:27 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-21 16:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 23:08 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 2:02 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 16:02 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 16:50 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 21:12 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 21:26 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
[not found] ` <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101230839000.15065-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
[not found] ` <94rbdo$vf$1@wanadoo.fr>
2001-01-26 16:41 ` LOF4 (Was Re: Extensible Enummerated types) Brian Rogoff
2001-01-20 22:34 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 16:09 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 19:04 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 19:26 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 21:12 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 17:47 ` Nick Roberts
2001-01-21 19:37 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 17:26 ` Mark Lundquist
2001-01-22 20:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2001-01-22 21:41 ` Matthew Woodcraft
2001-01-30 16:17 ` Tucker Taft
2001-01-31 8:05 ` Extensible Enumerated " Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-10 20:34 ` Vincent Marciante
2001-01-31 8:05 ` Supertypes RE: Extensible Enumerated types Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-01-31 15:15 ` Marin David Condic
2001-02-01 22:03 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Nick Roberts
2001-02-02 3:48 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2001-02-02 4:41 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-02-02 7:26 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-02 16:38 ` Robert Dewar
2001-02-02 20:39 ` (Private message. Sorry) Nick Roberts
2001-01-22 15:02 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Ted Dennison
2001-01-28 8:10 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-02 21:54 ` Nick Roberts
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox