From: joswig@corporate-world.lisp.de
Subject: Re: Ada and JVM? Why not AdaVM?
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 16:19:46 GMT
Date: 2001-02-01T16:19:46+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95c2ao$r1v$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m3zog7i84b.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com
In article <m3zog7i84b.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com>,
Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com> wrote:
> Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
> > The Python and Emacs VMs are quite widespread and platform independent
> > (the Emacs VM has probably been ported to more platforms than the
> > JVM). And both support loading arbitrary bytecode (AFAIK, Perl does
> > not), so it's really possible to adapt an Ada compiler to this
> > platform.
>
> Last time I checked, the emacs "vm" was a lisp interpreter.
Look again. Emacs has a VM *and* a lisp interpreter.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-01 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-27 16:47 Ada and JVM? Why not AdaVM? chris.danx
2001-01-27 21:17 ` David Starner
2001-01-28 8:44 ` Florian Weimer
2001-01-29 23:40 ` Ronald Cole
2001-01-30 1:27 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-30 8:28 ` Florian Weimer
2001-01-30 19:29 ` Ada and JVM? Why not AdaVM? ms .net vm Singlespeeder
2001-02-01 0:01 ` Ada and JVM? Why not AdaVM? Ronald Cole
2001-02-01 7:32 ` Florian Weimer
2001-02-02 17:33 ` Ray Blaak
2001-02-01 11:57 ` Tarjei T. Jensen
2001-02-01 17:35 ` Ray Blaak
2001-02-01 16:19 ` joswig [this message]
2001-01-30 21:12 ` Nick Roberts
2001-02-02 0:19 ` Larry J. Elmore
2001-02-02 3:41 ` Robert Dewar
2001-02-03 3:49 ` Larry J. Elmore
2001-02-05 19:46 ` Tucker Taft
2001-02-05 20:31 ` Ted Dennison
2001-02-05 20:58 ` Pat Rogers
2001-01-27 22:31 ` gdemont
2001-01-30 2:41 ` Julian Morrison
2001-01-30 7:08 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-01-30 12:55 ` John English
2001-01-31 21:05 ` chris.danx
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox