From: wbralick@afit-ab.arpa (William A. Bralick)
Subject: Re: Unknown government training?
Date: 28 Feb 89 03:52:23 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <950@afit-ab.arpa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 37413@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
In article <37413@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> Alan Beal <beal@cis.ohio-state.edu> writes:
> I may have been premature in implying that the government isn't using ADA
> at this time or isn't planning to use ADA in the future.
Rest assured that the government has plenty of Air Defense Artillery units.
The ADA is certainly a critical element of our force structure. This
discussion is probably better suited to sci.military, though.
(I know, but I couldn't help myself :-)
Regards,
--
Will Bralick : wbralick@afit-ab.arpa | If we desire to defeat the enemy,
Air Force Institute of Technology, | we must proportion our efforts to
| his powers of resistance.
with disclaimer; use disclaimer; | - Carl von Clauswitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1989-02-28 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1989-02-27 21:41 Unknown government training? Ben x2302
1989-02-28 2:53 ` Alan Beal
1989-02-28 3:52 ` William A. Bralick [this message]
1989-03-01 12:24 ` James Haskins
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1989-03-01 21:58 Unknown Government Training ? Mark Oestmann
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox