From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Optimization Question
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 16:59:49 GMT
Date: 2001-01-22T16:59:49+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94hou0$qds$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 94hmdt$nqd$1@nnrp1.deja.com
In article <94hmdt$nqd$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:
> The issue is that if you do a call for byte by byte, there
> is a lot of computational overhead. For example, this means
> you have to check for each byte written whether the file is
> currently open in the appropriate mode.
...transforming a small one-time overhead into 1,450,000 small one-time
overheads. Ahhhh....OK. You're right; I should have seen that.
--
T.E.D.
http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-22 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-22 0:05 Optimization Question dvdeug
2001-01-22 1:57 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 3:22 ` dvdeug
2001-01-22 4:05 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 4:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 19:04 ` M. Kotiaho
2001-01-22 20:22 ` dvdeug
2001-01-22 15:24 ` Ted Dennison
2001-01-22 16:12 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 16:48 ` Ted Dennison
2001-01-22 16:15 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 15:26 ` Ted Dennison
2001-01-22 16:17 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 16:59 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2001-01-22 22:01 ` Keith Thompson
2001-01-22 22:52 ` dvdeug
2001-01-23 6:46 ` Keith Thompson
[not found] ` <94ld65$1hs$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
[not found] ` <864ryodb1q.fsf@acm.org>
[not found] ` <3A6F663E.C84B94D8@acm.org>
2001-01-26 16:30 ` Optimization Question -- Follow up on using the stream read (and write) procedures directly Jeff Creem
2001-01-26 21:46 ` Florian Weimer
2001-01-27 19:14 ` Jeff Creem
2001-01-28 0:26 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox