From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 02:02:38 GMT
Date: 2001-01-22T02:02:38+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94g4bq$ghb$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.BSF.4.21.0101211432040.26405-100000@shell5.ba.best.com
In article
<Pine.BSF.4.21.0101211432040.26405-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>,
Brian Rogoff <bpr@shell5.ba.best.com> wrote:
> Hmmph, I don't recall the "common/popular" qualifier in the
> original question
My message was not responding to you, it was responding to Mark
Caroll's (I hope I remember the name right) message saying that
he found this feature useful in his current programming. So I
asked him what language he was using, and after a bit of too
and fro, he realized he had got confused, and was not saying
what he meant to say.
So I was indeed looking for a common/popular language, since
that is clearly what his message implied, but as above, it
turns out there was a confusion, which does not surprise me,
because I definitely would find it unusual if some programmer
said they used this feature frequently and found it useful
(it would mean they were an afficionado of obscure languages
:-)
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-22 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-20 7:26 Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-01-20 14:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-20 16:19 ` Jeff Creem
2001-01-20 16:23 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-20 19:18 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-20 22:27 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-21 16:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 23:08 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 2:02 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2001-01-22 16:02 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 16:50 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 21:12 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 21:26 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
[not found] ` <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101230839000.15065-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
[not found] ` <94rbdo$vf$1@wanadoo.fr>
2001-01-26 16:41 ` LOF4 (Was Re: Extensible Enummerated types) Brian Rogoff
2001-01-20 22:34 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 16:09 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 19:04 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 19:26 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 21:12 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 17:47 ` Nick Roberts
2001-01-21 19:37 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 17:26 ` Mark Lundquist
2001-01-22 20:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2001-01-22 21:41 ` Matthew Woodcraft
2001-01-30 16:17 ` Tucker Taft
2001-01-31 8:05 ` Extensible Enumerated " Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-10 20:34 ` Vincent Marciante
2001-01-31 8:05 ` Supertypes RE: Extensible Enumerated types Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-01-31 15:15 ` Marin David Condic
2001-02-01 22:03 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Nick Roberts
2001-02-02 3:48 ` Robert Dewar
2001-02-02 4:41 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-02-02 7:26 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-02 16:38 ` Robert Dewar
2001-02-02 20:39 ` (Private message. Sorry) Nick Roberts
2001-01-22 15:02 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Ted Dennison
2001-01-28 8:10 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-02 21:54 ` Nick Roberts
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox