From: "Nick Roberts" <nickroberts@callnetuk.com>
Subject: Re: Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 17:47:25 -0000
Date: 2001-01-21T17:47:25+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94f9qf$dc4s7$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: t6jeim807fic0a@corp.supernews.com
I like this idea. It seems to me that it could be really useful sometimes
(enough to justify it). It also seems to me that there would be no major
implementation problem. It would require a number of changes and insertions
to the RM, but nothing drastic. Gets my vote.
--
Nick Roberts
http://www.AdaOS.org
"Jeff Creem" <jeff@thecreems.com> wrote in message
news:t6jeim807fic0a@corp.supernews.com...
> ...
> There are of course other perfectly acceptable methods but at times it
would
> be cleaner to be able to do things like
>
> type Fruit_Type is (Apple, Orange);
> type New_Fruit_Type is new Fruit_Type with (Pear, Kiwi);
>
> A : Fruit_Type := Apple;
> B : New_Fruit_Type := New_Fruit_Type(A);
> ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-21 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-20 7:26 Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-01-20 14:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-20 16:19 ` Jeff Creem
2001-01-20 16:23 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-20 19:18 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-20 22:27 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-21 16:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 23:08 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 2:02 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 16:02 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 16:50 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 21:12 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 21:26 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
[not found] ` <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101230839000.15065-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
[not found] ` <94rbdo$vf$1@wanadoo.fr>
2001-01-26 16:41 ` LOF4 (Was Re: Extensible Enummerated types) Brian Rogoff
2001-01-20 22:34 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 16:09 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 19:04 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 19:26 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 21:12 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 17:47 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2001-01-21 19:37 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 17:26 ` Mark Lundquist
2001-01-22 20:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2001-01-22 21:41 ` Matthew Woodcraft
2001-01-30 16:17 ` Tucker Taft
2001-01-31 8:05 ` Extensible Enumerated " Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-10 20:34 ` Vincent Marciante
2001-01-31 8:05 ` Supertypes RE: Extensible Enumerated types Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-01-31 15:15 ` Marin David Condic
2001-02-01 22:03 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Nick Roberts
2001-02-02 3:48 ` Robert Dewar
2001-02-02 4:41 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-02-02 7:26 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-02 16:38 ` Robert Dewar
2001-02-02 20:39 ` (Private message. Sorry) Nick Roberts
2001-01-22 15:02 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Ted Dennison
2001-01-28 8:10 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-02 21:54 ` Nick Roberts
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox