From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 16:09:02 GMT
Date: 2001-01-21T16:09:02+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94f1ir$kkc$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 94d3q6$a8d$1@news.cis.ohio-state.edu
In article <94d3q6$a8d$1@news.cis.ohio-state.edu>,
carroll@cis.ohio-state.edu (Mark Carroll) wrote:
> In article <94coa2$v2v$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:
> (snip)
> >How about specifices, since not many languages support
> >this capability (C and C++ do not even have enumeration
> >types in the sense in which we are discussing things now
> >after all :-)
>
> Modula-3 is probably an example of a reasonable starting
> point.
Are you answering my question and saying that Modula-3 already
has this capability? If so, OK, but I was unaware of this.
Or are you saying this is a reasonable starting point for the
design of such an extension?
If so, I disagree, certainly in this forum, the reasonable
starting point is the worked out Ada 95 feature that was
rejected.
Tuck, is that available in some retrievable and postable form?
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-21 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-20 7:26 Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-01-20 14:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-20 16:19 ` Jeff Creem
2001-01-20 16:23 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-20 19:18 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-20 22:27 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-21 16:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 23:08 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 2:02 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 16:02 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 16:50 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 21:12 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 21:26 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
[not found] ` <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101230839000.15065-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
[not found] ` <94rbdo$vf$1@wanadoo.fr>
2001-01-26 16:41 ` LOF4 (Was Re: Extensible Enummerated types) Brian Rogoff
2001-01-20 22:34 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 16:09 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2001-01-21 19:04 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 19:26 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 21:12 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 17:47 ` Nick Roberts
2001-01-21 19:37 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 17:26 ` Mark Lundquist
2001-01-22 20:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2001-01-22 21:41 ` Matthew Woodcraft
2001-01-30 16:17 ` Tucker Taft
2001-01-31 8:05 ` Extensible Enumerated " Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-10 20:34 ` Vincent Marciante
2001-01-31 8:05 ` Supertypes RE: Extensible Enumerated types Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-01-31 15:15 ` Marin David Condic
2001-02-01 22:03 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Nick Roberts
2001-02-02 3:48 ` Robert Dewar
2001-02-02 4:41 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-02-02 7:26 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-02 16:38 ` Robert Dewar
2001-02-02 20:39 ` (Private message. Sorry) Nick Roberts
2001-01-22 15:02 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Ted Dennison
2001-01-28 8:10 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-02 21:54 ` Nick Roberts
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox