From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Ada 95 grammar for aflex?
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 16:01:38 GMT
Date: 2001-01-21T16:01:38+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94f14v$k8i$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3A6A418E.80F1ADC@uol.com.br
In article <3A6A418E.80F1ADC@uol.com.br>,
Cesar Rabak <csrabak@uol.com.br> wrote:
> So we're detecting an opportunity for improvement!
Not really, there's nothing new here that has not been
known for a long time :-)
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-21 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-18 14:54 Ada 95 grammar for aflex? Ralf Reißing
2001-01-18 15:07 ` Frode Tenneboe
2001-01-18 15:37 ` Ted Dennison
2001-01-19 11:15 ` Mario Amado Alves
2001-01-19 16:36 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-19 18:29 ` Cesar Rabak
2001-01-20 14:30 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-20 16:19 ` Cesar Rabak
2001-01-20 19:25 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 1:55 ` Cesar Rabak
2001-01-21 16:01 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2001-01-22 15:58 ` Ira D. Baxter
2001-01-22 17:32 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 4:46 ` Larry Hazel
2001-01-21 16:02 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 17:30 ` Larry Hazel
2001-01-21 22:42 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-01-23 4:16 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox