From: "Nick Roberts" <nickroberts@callnetuk.com>
Subject: Re: Memory representation of variable length record components
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:58:00 -0000
Date: 2001-01-17T22:58:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94583d$bks5t$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrn96b0tc.18v.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de
Lutz, it seems to me that you can define a record type for the IP header
(the first 5 32-bit words) in the way you showed. That would then leave you
using something slightly less easy (e.g. streams) to deal with the options
and payload. Not perfect, but not too hard! Am I missing the point?
--
Nick Roberts
http://www.AdaOS.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-17 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-17 11:38 Memory representation of variable length record components Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-01-17 14:40 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-01-17 22:58 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2001-01-18 8:45 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox